Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ReleaseTheHounds

“Good explanaton, hankbrown... Freepers should move on. This stuff isn’t going anywhere.”
************

Well, facts are stubborn things. Eventually there will be someone that does have standing (like Keyes) and the case will be heard. IMO this would be a much easier issue to deal with a president-elect rather than a president. For that reason alone I think the Supreme Court will consider this matter.

It is pretty amazing that every case has been thrown out because of lack of standing. As ugly as it is, this is a constitutional issue that really needs to be resolved.


14 posted on 11/26/2008 1:17:59 PM PST by koraz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: koraz
It is pretty amazing that every case has been thrown out because of lack of standing.

This is exactly what I was thinking. Now I know the courts have these arcane "precedents" and such, but for crying out loud, this should be a no brainer, I would think any citizen of the U.S. would have standing to bring a case asking if the person about to take the oath of office for POTUS meets constitutional muster. No?

19 posted on 11/26/2008 1:45:50 PM PST by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson