Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq parliament passes landmark U.S. security pact
Reuters ^

Posted on 11/27/2008 6:22:01 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Iraq parliament passes U.S. security pact Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:12am EST

By Ahmed Rasheed

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's parliament approved a landmark security pact with the United States Thursday that paves the way for U.S. forces to withdraw by the end of 2011.

The deal, which parliament linked after days of fractious negotiations to a series of promised political reforms and a public referendum next year, brings in sight an end to the U.S. military presence that began with the 2003 invasion.

Lawmakers in Iraq's 275-seat parliament passed the deal with a majority of 149 out of 198 present, Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani said.

It was not immediately clear if that constituted enough of a consensus to satisfy the demands of the country's most influential Shi'ite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, whose support for the deal is crucial.

But concessions linking the security pact to other issues, such as the referendum, were agreed between the country's ruling Shi'ite-led coalition and two Sunni Arab factions that have been holding up the vote for a couple of days.

Under the deal, U.S. troops will have to pull out of Iraqi cities and into bases by the middle of next year and leave the country by the end of 2011.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiparliament; mohammedanism; progress; rebuildingiraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2008 6:22:02 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sigh. I sure hope they do not EVER forget the sacrifices of the 3000+ US Martyrs who bravely gave their lives so that these idiots could sell us oil at $150/barrel.


2 posted on 11/27/2008 6:28:42 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

I still find it hard to believe that we will leave Iraq. That was our beachhead against terrorists. I would have much preferred that we relocate the Iraqis to Saudi Arabia.


3 posted on 11/27/2008 6:29:35 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
The faces on the little kids tell the story. They don't remember life under Saddam. But the parents do and all most parents care about is that their children are "safe"...just like we do.

Children will no longer be raised under a dictator....a dictator who controlled the sons and daughters of these parents....The same sons and daughters who have joined the Iraqi army, who go to market, to school.

I wish them well.

4 posted on 11/27/2008 6:41:54 AM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
FOX just reported the year as 2012 (not 2011).

Hubby and I just looked at each other and simultaneously said..."2012, the end of his term?...interesting."

ALSO on FOX - international correspondent said, "it's hard to wrap your mind around this..." referring to the Mumbai terror attack. It's not hard for those who understand what an ISLAMIC TERRORIST is, and that they hate America, Democracy, and the West - WE GET IT...it's journalists that live in another world that have the hard time!

5 posted on 11/27/2008 6:42:29 AM PST by NordP (PALIN POWER: She's Reagan in heels, Teddy Roosevelt in a dress & like Rummy at a press conference!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I wish them well too and a happy kid anywhere is worth anything in heaven.

My only complaint is that we should have had a permanent presence in Iraq. That is our beachhead.

Whenever we do that (Europe, Japan etc) we ensure peace for generations.


6 posted on 11/27/2008 6:45:16 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
I agree it was our beachhead and IMHO, if we had not gone there, it would have been the biggest Alqueda base in the world.

I can remember the Middle East being "a problem" from when I was a kid in third grade...almost 60 years now.

Our problem is still "oil dependence"....and it's the Dems who are keeping us in a very bad position with their "no drill" policy....AND ultimately causes the surge in prices for oil......And CORN related industries. They're just plain stupid.

7 posted on 11/27/2008 6:53:51 AM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s not as if all of us will leave, just the bulk of the 100.000 plus conventional Marines and Soldiers. There will always be a few advisers and military missions there, and maybe a modular base or two.


8 posted on 11/27/2008 7:23:23 AM PST by re_tail20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Is it just me, or can everyone appreciate what this article just said? First: The ‘Iraqi Parliament’ was mentioned in a sentence. This in an of itself is fantastic. Iraq actually has a parliament....not a bunch of Saddam drones rubber stamping the latest dictators blather so their families don’t get killed. This is great stuff. Second: We’ve been told by the Euro’s, the media, the Dems, and much of the Arab world that Iraq doesn’t want democracy.....that oppressive dictatorship and tribalism (read: gangs) is their culture. Well, if so, why did the Parliament overwhelming approve the presence of the US troops?

President Bush has been called an idiot and simpleton by his detractors. Heck, his presidency was destroyed by the Iraqi invasion. But, he has held fast to the belief that through democracy there is hope and hope will prove to be more enticing than terror in the long run. So far, I would say his argument is proving to be correct.

The Euro’s, the Dems, and the media have made getting to today’s historic Iraqi Parliment vote much more painful than it really needed to be. By refusing to get behind the President, the enemies of freedom were encourage and as a result many more Americans were needlessly killed.

History will definitely record a lot of stupidity during the Iraq mission. It will not be associated with President Bush, though.


9 posted on 11/27/2008 7:27:04 AM PST by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

I agree

This is history, and nobody’s watching, except us


10 posted on 11/27/2008 7:28:48 AM PST by re_tail20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

......his presidency was destroyed by the Iraqi invasion......

Only in the mind of the MSM. He retained power an prosecuted the war on terror.


11 posted on 11/27/2008 7:33:24 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Save America......... put out lots of waferin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bert

Iraq certainly didn’t want to chance negotiations with Obama and having him pull the rug out from under it, by having Obama disasterously rush to have US forces evacuate from Iraq in 16 months. At least they bought an additional fourteen months.


12 posted on 11/27/2008 7:36:09 AM PST by eaglewingz08 (Koolaid Drinkers Need Not Apply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So 77 parliament members just didn’t show up to vote on this? Wasn’t this sort of important?


13 posted on 11/27/2008 7:40:01 AM PST by sazerac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sazerac

So 77 parliament members just didn’t show up to vote on this? Wasn’t this sort of important?

Maybe they should have shown up and voted “present”.


14 posted on 11/27/2008 7:55:43 AM PST by beekay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Sure, you just keep believing that tale....


15 posted on 11/27/2008 8:56:54 AM PST by misterrob (Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NordP

Yes—I heard that too, and thought the same thing—but the date is Jan. 1, 2012, which is just over three years away.

Of course, Hussein’s first(and only term, please God!)would end on Jan. 20, 2013.


16 posted on 11/27/2008 9:00:49 AM PST by exit82 (It's all Obama's fault. And Biden is still a moron. They are both above their paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Iraq is a sovereign nation. The Coalition doesn’t own it and are simply guests of the Iraqi government in power. The same for Afghanistan.


17 posted on 11/27/2008 9:26:47 AM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

I fully agree it is a sovereign nation. Just like Germany and Japan were after WW II. We stayed behind to ensure the peace and the maturation of democracy.

Vacating Iraq in 2011 seems hasty to me.


18 posted on 11/27/2008 11:47:05 AM PST by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Girlene; Lancey Howard; xzins

SOFA’s finally a done deal.


19 posted on 11/27/2008 2:38:55 PM PST by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Iraqi gov’t is given STRICT OVERSIGHT of the 150,000 US troops.

What does this mean?


20 posted on 11/27/2008 5:03:22 PM PST by Athena51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson