Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCalPol

If the Republicans would have ran as anti-amnesty, fiscal conservative, social-conservative patriots, they would have won.

McCain was PRO-amnesty, robbing the GOP of a potentially election winning topic. He was a socialist, big government spender like Bush, and is lukewarm on socially conservative issues.

The RINOS told us all that we needed McCain, and now that McCain got beat by the most liberal guy in the Senate, they’re telling us that McCain was too FAR to the right. Are you ready to stop trusting them yet? There seems to be a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican party and the obvious answer is that the core principles need to return or we continue to drift towards socialism.


51 posted on 11/27/2008 11:13:39 PM PST by fightingpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: fightingpatriot

I see you signed up 27 Nov 08 to bring typical shoot from the lip comments.

Threads set up by a school boy who probably never held a real job for two straight years in the real world is not where I would look for enlightenment.

Those into groupthink get sucked into this exercise of Displacement and Spliting by the uninformed.

As a Reagan Republican who actually worked for him in his first campaign for Gov. at his headquarters here in San Diego, have followed politics and world affairs since I was probably ten years old in the 50s.
Not to mention being in the front lines face to face against the Code Pinkos, to being part of a group countering over 50,000 Mexicans.

Not being a Pedantic professional school kid, I have
actually experienced the real world first in administrative
work to many years in the legal field with the County Attorneys.

The article the thread is based on is from the Washington. Post, that bastion of Liberalalism. It brings in a Prof.
another professional school boy who has no real world experience and who thought Kerry would beat Bush in 04
bassed on his distain for Bush.

McCain was not my first choice in the primary but Obama, a man child who has spent his life in Universities and alliance to Marxism, I did not want to see as president.

Living in a large city and one with the largest concentration of Military in the U.S. also sitting around 18 miles north from the largest and busiest border crossing in the world, you have a clue what is going on.

We have two parties, you work in the Republican party to keep as many conservatives up front and elected to office.

Between the leftwing MSM and the Liberal Public schools and Univs., Liberals are flooding the electorial system.
The all or nothing mentality will not win.
We must be conservative but also somewhat pragmatic.

Third parties brought us Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter.
Two of our worst presidents.

Third parties suck in malcontents and give lip service to conservatives to draw them.
The candidates are delusiional and hold views more in line with the left such as being anti war, legalizing drugs,
9/11 Truthers all out of the Soros playbook, some like Barr are Global Warmers, for gay marriage, and amnesty and
Keyes for reparations among them.


53 posted on 11/28/2008 5:32:04 AM PST by SoCalPol (In Defeat: Defiance - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson