Posted on 11/28/2008 1:48:24 PM PST by dbz77
Thousands of Iraqis detained by US forces are at risk of torture or even execution, following the ratification of a security agreement between the US and Iraqi governments.
Under the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), which will take effect on 31 December, around 16,000 prisoners held by the US will be transferred to Iraqi custody.
Those at particular risk include former Ba’ath party officials or those who held posts under Saddam Hussain's government.
Ali Hassan al-Majid and two others sentenced to death for crimes committed under Saddam Hussain’s rule are likely to be executed if handed over to the Iraqi authorities.
"The Status of Forces Agreement does not provide any safeguards whatsoever for prisoners transferred to Iraqi custody," said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Programme.
"These prisoners will potentially be moving from the frying pan into the fire. We receive persistent reports of gross human rights violations – including torture – taking place in Iraqi prisons and detention centres. The US must ensure that no one is transferred to Iraq custody if they would face a real risk of torture or other human rights violations."
Most of those detained by the US are held without charge or trial, some for more than five years, and without recourse to any independent review of their detention.
The Iraqi authorities are already holding thousands of people, many without charge or trial, and often in appalling conditions. Many have no access to lawyers. Others have been sentenced to death after trials which failed to meet international fair trial standards.
"We need to see evidence that there is systematic improvement," said Malcolm Smart. "Detainees officially registered and held only in recognised prisons; regular, independent, and effective visiting mechanisms; prompt access to lawyers and their families and to any necessary medical treatment; and their due process rights – including the right to challenge their detention before an independent tribunal – fully respected."
The SOFA contains no reference to more than 2,000 Iranians associated with the People's Mojahedeen Organization of Iran (PMOI), an Iranian opposition organization, who remain at Ashraf Camp in northern Iraq. They have been under the protection of US forces there for several years.
The Iraqi government is reported to have told the PMOI that those at Camp Ashraf must leave Iraq by 31 December 2008. Some Iraqi officials have suggested that they will be forcibly expelled if they fail to comply. According to Amnesty International, the Iranians would be at risk of serious human rights violations if they were forcibly returned to Iran.
Amnesty International also highlighted that while the agreement removes the immunity against prosecution of private contractors employed by the US Department of Defense, it makes no reference to other private military and security contractors, such as those employed by the US State Department, who have previously been accused of killing civilians in Iraq.
This would include the Blackwater security firm, which was accused of gross human rights violations last year and was employed by the US State Department.
Under the SOFA, which will replace the current UN mandate, US troops will pull back from urban areas by the end of June 2009 and withdraw from Iraq by the end of 2011. After 31 December, Iraqi authorities will have a greater say in the conduct of daily US military operations in Iraq.
Article 12 (1) of the SOFA states that Iraq has the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over members of the US forces and their civilian component for any grave premeditated felonies that they commit, when such crimes are committed outside agreed facilities and outside "duty status." However, the nature of these felonies and the procedures to be followed are not clarified, and it is the US authorities who will determine when its soldiers or employees were acting under "duty status."
The Left has been accusing Americans of torturing prisoners as a matter of policy.
How could the transferring the prisoners to Iraqi custody put them at any additional risk of torture?
If we don’t have a “liberal horse puckey” alert here at FR, we sure need one now!
That’s it, I say we put Rosie O’donuts dirty dirty undies on these guys heads and prance them around like the dogs they are.
Worse than cyanide.
Says who?
Bwahaha! =D
Wait a minute...you mean we are NOT the bad guys???
Wait a minute...you mean we are NOT the bad guys???Apparently, Amnesty International did not get the memo.
The prisoners know that they may be subject to ACTUAL torture, not the "panties on the head" kind of torture.
The prisoners know that they may be subject to ACTUAL torture, not the "panties on the head" kind of torture.They would suffer less torture in the general populations of San Quentin or Corcoran.
America cannot direct another country in how they handle their prisoners. So, in that case, let Iraq do what they will!!
“Aw Jeez...” That about says it all!
“Am-Nasty Enter-NUTZ-all” is never pleased no matter what.
Amnesty International- The Ralph Nader of NGOs.
Chemical Ali should have been turned over for execution long ago. He won’t be missed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.