Posted on 11/30/2008 5:03:43 AM PST by Kaslin
Townhall is starting to turn CINO. They’re allowing too many “moderate” voices on their website.
“According to evidence cited by the judge,gays are slightly more likely than heterosexuals to suffer psychiatric problems,engage in substance abuse....”.Only “slightly” more likely?Totally eroneous statement.The incidence of mental health problems,drug abuse,and std’s is statistically(profoundly)higher amongst homosexuals than heterosexuals.Domestic violence is another “touchy” issue.Contrary to conventional wisdom(indoctrination),homosexual males do abuse their mates.Again-statistically more so than hetero’s.
I disagree. The editorial is the opinion of one person, not the whole site
Do you see liberals posting liberal articles and vanity posts here? Townhall should only promote conservative points of views.
What has happened to Townhall?
“Gays are treated as more dangerous than felons, drug offenders and known child abusers — none of whom is categorically barred from adopting.”
I noticed that child molesters weren’t mentioned, or is that included in child abusers?
Wiser words have rarely been spoken. Well said, ex_desert_cowboy.
Homosexuals want to claim normalcy - and not only that, they want us all to acknowledge it. What happened to TownHall, that they would let this propaganda/filth on their website?
Correction: it is a liberal-tarian website...
Having children is a heterosexual desire.
Lemmings over a cliff.
When did this happen? I haven’t much computer time for quite a while now, so maybe it’s been going on for several months. This is the second freakishly liberal article I’ve seen at Townhall in as many days. Has this become a common occurrence?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
I’m baffled. When did Townhall go to the dark side?
That’s a good question. Fox News and Drudge didn’t really surprise me, but I always assumed that Townhall would adhere to conservatism.
That is because the APA is full of homos. There are more queers working in the mental health field than as hairdressers these days.
I thought Townhall used to be conservative, some years ago.
T’aint so.
There is nothing wrong with the laws, they do not need changing. The screening process for adoption is so tough and thorough, ALL of the categories Me. Chapman cites would be disqualified/denied. In fact, where homosexuals are allowed to adopt, the screening process for heterosexuals who wish to adopt, is much more rigorous/strict than for homosexuals. I know, I have seen some wonderful people be denied for the most ridiculous reasons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.