Skip to comments.
Why Rush Limbaugh is a leading American intellectual
American Thinker ^
| November 30, 2008
| James Lewis
Posted on 11/30/2008 6:16:16 AM PST by vietvet67
I have a bone to pick with Rush Limbaugh about the word "intellectual." He says he isn't one. But Rush is the sharpest political commentator we have today. He is a public intellectual in the old sense: A fine, original thinker who constantly reveals new truths that slip past the mindless media. He can communicate with whoever bothers to listen, as tens of millions of people do every week, throwing a sharp light on the biggest questions we face. And he's entertaining and funny.
Rush has a well-thought-out political philosophy, with deep roots in European and American history. He constantly collects real evidence, and is better at explaining it to millions of listeners than anybody else today. Limbaugh has a twenty year track record of sifting truths from lies; that is not an accident, any more than Tiger Woods is an accident. It comes from great talent and lifelong practice.
In the upshot, Rush is a voice for rationality and sanity in a world awash in madness and propaganda. If that's not the proper role of an intellectual, what is?
The words "intellect" and "intellectual" deserve to be rescued from the myth-makers of the Left, which has decided in its amazing arrogance that it really owns those words. But that is just another sign of its narrow-minded cultism. The Left shuts out competing voices, like any other cult, and then becomes outraged when independent thinkers don't agree with its "smelly little orthodoxies" --- as George Orwell famously called them. (Orwell started as a Leftist and then figured out the scam.)
An intellectual is just a thinker, somebody who uses the intellect and does it well. An athlete is somebody who uses physical talent and does it well. Those words stand for excellence.
Rush Limbaugh listens to hundreds of competing voices and finds ways to make sense of them. That is what good intellectuals do -- a lot of listening, a lot of dialogue, a lot of clarification. Talk show hosts have the perfect job for it.
By far the majority of the great intellectuals in history have been conservatives, going back to the two main wellsprings of Western thought, the Greeks and the Bible. It is also true in ancient India and China. Confucius was one of the world's great conservative thinkers, emphasizing personal and governmental morality, correct social relationships, justice and sincerity.
(Which is why that Leftist hero Mao Zedong
murdered tens of millions of people trying to uproot Confucian traditions in China. In the end, Confucius won.)
Plato was a great conservative. Cicero was a great conservative. The American Founders were conservatives, with rare exceptions. The wisdom books of the Bible are full of conservative sayings. That's what the Ten Commandments are about. "Honor your father and mother" is a profoundly conservative idea.
All high civilizations have been built by conservatives. You can't accumulate the cultural capital needed to build any high civilization if you try to destroy the past, as the Left constantly tries to do. You can't build a chariot if you have to reinvent the wheel every generation. The batty idea that kids have the real answers in life is just a modern delusion. It is just ignorant.
Conservatism builds. Leftism overthrows. That is the meaning of that pop word "revolution." The all-destroying revolution is an adolescent fantasy, and the Left hangs on to those fantasies a lot longer than conservatives do.
The idea of a "revolutionary" intellectual class is also a modern invention, made up to prop up the cult ego of the scribbling classes -- the teachers, newspaper writers and bureaucrats. Doctor Johnson called them the ink-stained drudges, and he was one himself. (A conservative, needless to say.) Professional word merchants only go back to 1800 or so.
Most prominent thinkers in history were talented amateurs, and didn't need to ride the wild horse of social revolution to gain control over other people. They kept their powerlust in check.
Socrates didn't have a college degree. He became an intellectual through constant dialogue. The Socratic dialogue is the origin of Western thought. Aristotle, the pupil of Plato, who in turn was the pupil of Socrates, founded the original "college" -- Aristotle's academy, which met in an Athenian grove. Mathematics goes back to Pythagoras and Euclid and many others, 25 centuries of cumulative thinking by talented amateurs. Almost nobody got paid for doing advanced mathematics until the 19th century. All from amateurs -- "lovers" -- of knowledge.
The same is true for the sciences and the other "departments" of human thought. But even the idea of "departments of thought" is a modern invention: As Alfred North Whitehead pointed out, "Nature has no departments." Neither does the human intellect. All that is just a bunch of paid professors trying to divide up the loot.
Intellectual creativity arose in thousands of places in the ancient world. We just happen to know more about Greece and the Hebrew and Christian sources than about the others. But they existed. Good thinkers are found all over, like good athletes and musicians. When they find other, they start to learn from each other, and then you see a spurt of creativity. It only takes a few to get it started.
But let me get back to Rush: Rush Limbaugh is far closer to the great tradition of Western intellectuals than anybody in the celebrity freak-show of the Left. It is the Rush Limbaughs who became Socrates and Plato in the ancient world. They composed the Psalms and the Book of Proverbs. They were not professional scribblers. They did not found a revolutionary cult designed to overthrow all the good traditions. They were talented talkers, and even better listeners. All good thinking starts from dialogue.
That's what the Doctor of Democracy does best today.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conservatives; limbaugh; rush; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-348 next last
1
posted on
11/30/2008 6:16:16 AM PST
by
vietvet67
To: vietvet67
That Limbaugh guy talks too much.
2
posted on
11/30/2008 6:20:11 AM PST
by
humblegunner
(Where my PIE at, fool?)
To: vietvet67
3
posted on
11/30/2008 6:20:59 AM PST
by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: vietvet67
He is a public intellectual in the old sense: A fine, original thinker who constantly reveals new truths that slip past the mindless media.
It doesn't slip past the socialist media. They purposely omit the truth to suit their agenda.
4
posted on
11/30/2008 6:21:13 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: vietvet67
Had a liberal friend recently tell me that Rush was a “hater”...I asked him for an example...he said he’d never actually listened to him...but he drew this conclusion from the mainstream media.
Typical.
5
posted on
11/30/2008 6:21:33 AM PST
by
kjo
To: vietvet67
No one salutes Rush more than I do and the depths of his knowledge continue to surprise me.
But, if he does not cover the BC controversy this week in- depth he will disappoint much of his audience.
6
posted on
11/30/2008 6:21:41 AM PST
by
rodguy911
(HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
To: vietvet67
7
posted on
11/30/2008 6:25:35 AM PST
by
Oratam
To: vietvet67
Rush has consistently failed to identify, name, and educate his listeners about America's **greatest** threat: MARXISM!
Thankfully, in the past year he is finally taking a few pot shots at government schools. ( Government schools, by the way, are the Marxists’ most important and powerful weapon.)
He has also failed to educate his listeners about Obama’s birth certificate issues. This utterly mystifies me.
To: vietvet67
I tend to tire of many other talk show hosts, but never tire of Rush. Even when he talks sports, which isn’t something I’m all that interested in.
9
posted on
11/30/2008 6:27:02 AM PST
by
Lacey
To: vietvet67
When they find other, they start to learn from each other, and then you see a spurt of creativity. It only takes a few to get it started.Great find, brilliant observation. Conversely, when liberals get together, they make [bad] laws! Stifling creativity in the process, usually with unintended consequences, which will be modified with more bad laws!
10
posted on
11/30/2008 6:28:48 AM PST
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
Thank you, AmericanThinker.com for this article.
Words cannot express what Rush has done for this country.
Rush, I know you read FR. I hope you’re reading this. We love you! Thank you for using your God-given talents. May God bless you richly.
11
posted on
11/30/2008 6:31:13 AM PST
by
ync1994
To: wintertime
Thankfully, in the past year he is finally taking a few pot shots at government schools. ( Government schools, by the way, are the Marxists most important and powerful weapon.)WRONG...Rush has been using the world 'screwalls' for the last 20 years! tho' he may spell it different than I!
12
posted on
11/30/2008 6:31:40 AM PST
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: wintertime
I am not sure why Rush has avoided the issue.
But I have one idea-one of the major forces behind the issue
is Berg. As I recall from posts here-Berg also believes that 9/11 was an inside job. Perhaps Rush does not want to give credence to anyone with that view. The MSM would attack Rush as it never has before and connect him with 9/11 “truthers”
To: vietvet67
“Why Rush Limbaugh is a leading American intellectual”
******************
Yeh, he is.....
Especially compared to some body like 0’pinhead, etc., etc.
14
posted on
11/30/2008 6:32:38 AM PST
by
gunnyg
To: humblegunner
That old windbag is a intellectual
15
posted on
11/30/2008 6:32:43 AM PST
by
al baby
(Hi mom Honkeys for Mc Cain Palin)
To: wintertime
He has also failed to educate his listeners about obama's birth certificat issues.this utterly mustifies me. Many of us are mystifiyed by this.
It's not as if he has to take a stand or go ballistic like some of us do, but at least present the issues and let his listeners know what is going on. That should not be asking too much.
16
posted on
11/30/2008 6:32:54 AM PST
by
rodguy911
(HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
To: kjo
One of the liberal gals at work was talking about something “Rush did or lied about”. I can’t remember the exact thing she mentioned, but I went onto my Rush 24/7, looked it up and found the transcript she was talking about.
Of course, the liberal gal read about “what Rush did or lied about” from the nyt, so I showed her the transcript.
Her response.....”Oh”.
17
posted on
11/30/2008 6:33:38 AM PST
by
NoGrayZone
(Conservative Party...here I come!)
To: kjo
Had a liberal friend recently... I have no liberal friends, I find that they are incapable of true friendship. Have some liberal extended family members though with the same disorder. Some are union members that recently voted themselves out of a job (another company bought out their company, retirement funds and all--no retirement left) so the immediately blamed Bush...
18
posted on
11/30/2008 6:33:56 AM PST
by
brushcop
(We remember SSG Harrison Brown, PVT Andrew Simmons B CO 2/69 3ID KIA Iraq OIF IV)
To: Maine Mariner
Berg has become a bit player with the Cort/Donofrio cases coming up.
19
posted on
11/30/2008 6:34:22 AM PST
by
rodguy911
(HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
To: vietvet67
You may be right but I don’t think Rush would agree that he is in the same league as William Buckley, eventhough I think he is.
20
posted on
11/30/2008 6:35:41 AM PST
by
Rappini
("Pro deo et Patria.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-348 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson