Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr. Obama: Don’t Miss Next Week’s Chicago Tribune
Canada Free Press ^ | Sunday, November 30, 2008

Posted on 11/30/2008 7:24:51 AM PST by ckilmer

Our full-page Open Letter to Mr. Obama will be published in the Chicago Tribune on both Monday, December 1, 2008 and Wednesday, December 3, 2008. It will appear in the main news section. Click here to view a copy of the final ad.

The Open Letter to Mr. Obama is a formal Petition for a Redress (Remedy) for the alleged violation of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution of the United States of America.

Mr. Obama is respectfully requested to direct the Hawaiian officials to provide access to his original birth certificate on December 5-7 by our team of forensic scientists, and to provide additional documentary evidence establishing his citizenship status prior to our Washington, D.C. press conference on December 8.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Hawaii; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: ads; birthcertificate; certifigate; chicagotribune; obama; stbc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-243 next last
To: rodguy911
Who is this clown anyway?

I don't know, but when we find out, there are going to be a lot of books written about it.

I also believe that when he is finally revealed for what he is, the Democrat party will rue the day they ever heard his name.

141 posted on 11/30/2008 10:32:44 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JCG
Yes, I could imagine Obama’s doing this, but I will still think the fight will have been worth if it if this is what Obama does. After all, it will have been Obama’s choice all along NOT to make available a legit copy from the get-go.
142 posted on 11/30/2008 10:34:40 AM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

This thread should be on the sidebar somewhere.


143 posted on 11/30/2008 10:43:28 AM PST by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
The Obongo camp must be getting worried.

I think this article from the "Daily Nation (Nairobi),
Obama haters in last-ditch effort to derail his presidency
shows that they are definitely getting antsy.

144 posted on 11/30/2008 10:44:52 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: odin2008
let's say that obama is found to be Kenyan and loses the presidency. You know what will happen. Massive and deadly riots from the obama supporters. Complete break down of government and all social services.And you know who will get the blame and hatred. Those evil white conservatives.

Take a look at the 2004 election map. It shows every county that went blue and every one that went red.

Now, I'm originally from Los Angeles County, and I can tell you, that although that county shows blue on the 2004 electoral map, most neighborhoods there are composed of your basic middle class, law-abiding Americans. The type of neighborhoods in even solidly blue counties that would rampage about such a thing, are actually only a small portion.

Try to get the picture that the Obots who will rampage and riot only make up a small portion of those who voted for him. The rest are rainbow painted moonbats who wouldn't be brave enough to do more than carry a protest sign, if Obama is disqualified.

Massive and deadly riots...Complete break down of government and all social services...

Chill friend. The only ones capable of creating such a scenario is the patriotic right, if our Constitution is trampled by the usurpers.

145 posted on 11/30/2008 10:46:51 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mariebl
You're overlooking the fact that it's only a law, and the 'natural born citizen' requirement is part of the Constitution...

Not at all. I'm simply clarifying a single point on a law the poster referred to. I'm fully aware that the Constitution supersedes laws enacted by Congress.

146 posted on 11/30/2008 10:50:08 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: odin2008
Complete break down of government and all social services.

Good, I was wondering how we were going to accomplish that.

And you know who will get the blame and hatred. Those evil white conservatives.

It would be an honor and a privilege to be able to take credit for it.

147 posted on 11/30/2008 10:52:56 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs...nothing more than Bald Haired Hippies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
What specifically are you referring to re. the grandmother's language and village?

Here.

148 posted on 11/30/2008 11:01:56 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Be we're all arrogant when we go to Europe without knowing the language of the country we might be visiting.

But if you read the story the author makes it sound like the two are chatting away about their ancestors.

149 posted on 11/30/2008 11:04:16 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
That's not true, the electors can vote for whomever they choose, given that the candidate they are pledged to is found to not be able to serve.

I stand corrected. Yes, technically they could vote for someone outside the group of selected candidates on the ballot, but that is so rare, there have only been 7 electors to do this in all of the elections in the last 100 years. I'm thinking they would follow tradition and pick from the "approved" group remaining on the ballot - unless die-hard democrat electors tried to select another democrat that wasn't on the ballot...and it's almost certain they would not be able to consolidate enough votes for any one person, even if Obama "nominated" someone, LOL. They'd split it between Hillary and Biden almost for sure, regardless of what the Obamameister said. And, they'd all be divided off in their individual states, unable to truly negotiate a settlement candidate. Sweet. It's a mess, but I hope it happens, just so I can watch the MSM choke on it after their criminal conspiracy to manipulate the election. Justice, methinks.

150 posted on 11/30/2008 11:08:30 AM PST by thatdewd (All that is necessary for the triumph of Evil is that good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: sonic109
I wish I had your confidence in all of this . Obama’s camp are a slick bunch indeed. He has MASSIVE $$ and minions of lawyers. I can’t believe that a crew that won him the White house was so dumb as to not have his ass covered on this citizenship matter. It makes no sense.

Obama's crew represents the very best fruit of the radical liberal world, yet they are making error upon error, because like all criminals, they always leave clues. The Obots are pikers and bumblers. Kids straight out of their parents' basements.

Even Obama's top advisers are nothing more than liberal party hacks who've risen through the ranks, not because they're brilliant or effective, but because they've aided and abetted earlier left-liberal traitors, and got away with it.

The fact that he's got mega bucks at his disposal will not ensure victory, because he's spending it all on a massive deception campaign. One little problem with that plan...the truth. And Obama et al have proven that they're too inept and juvenile to hide it.

Hell, they're so inept, they're practically broadcasting the truth with every slimy thing they do. Only those who are willfully ignorant, or are not paying attention fail to see it.

151 posted on 11/30/2008 11:09:18 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
I thought the job automatically went to Biden?

It would if O was disqualified after the Electoral College votes, because it basically would be the same as if the President-Elect had died before taking office. Another reason it's so important that the Supreme Court act on these cases NOW. We've got 2 weeks left. They may just let it go on past the electoral vote. That way, even if O is disqualified, it would ensure that the party chosen by a majority of the voters (dead, imaginary, ineligible, and otherwise) still took the Office. Now THAT'S scary! President Biden....shudder...

152 posted on 11/30/2008 11:18:10 AM PST by thatdewd (All that is necessary for the triumph of Evil is that good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

I understand. The older I git, the worser my spellin gets. Just an old cowboy here but still people understand me and know what I’m talking about.


153 posted on 11/30/2008 11:25:18 AM PST by RC2 (Where is Obama's Birth Certifacte?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: thatdewd
I thought the job automatically went to Biden?

[[[ "It would if O was disqualified after the Electoral College votes, because it basically would be the same as if the President-Elect had died before taking office." ]]]

No. Biden would become acting President until a new President qualified. US Constitution, Amendment XX, Section 3.

154 posted on 11/30/2008 11:30:46 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
You are being silly.

Why don't you tell me what you meant then. I posted an excerpt from The Federalist Papers at #94 and you said, "Publishing threats of violence, even open rebellion, is damned stupid and counter productive."

ML/NJ

155 posted on 11/30/2008 11:44:24 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
My remark was about Obama's arrogance which I was reminded of by your comment. It had nothing to do with the original article.

ML/NJ

156 posted on 11/30/2008 11:47:06 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: thatdewd
Constitutionally, IF it is revealed before December 15 (when the Electors actually vote and choose a President-Elect) that he is not eligible to be POTUS, then the Electoral College must choose from the remaining candidates for the Office of President. So it would be between Nader, McCain, and Barr.

Nonsense. In the first place at least 24 states have Faithless Elector Laws requiring the electors to vote for the candidate they were selected to represent. Second, there is nothing in the 12th Amendment that says the Electoral College has to vote for a qualified candidate. The 12th Amendment kicks in when one candidate does not have a majority of the electoral votes. That is not the situation here, Obama has well over half the total votes. The relevant amendment if Obama is shown to be ineligible to be president is the 20th.

157 posted on 11/30/2008 12:23:17 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: odin2008
"You know what will happen. Massive and deadly riots from the obama supporters. Complete break down of government and all social services.And you know who will get the blame and hatred. Those evil white conservatives."

There ya go again. Playing on the fears of the multitude. I wish youse guys would be more creative. Y'all are getting so predictable you're losing your punch.

If the dems are so inclined to abolish the laws and rules of society through violence and mayhem, maybe it's time we had a real cleansing. It would be a great opportunity to rid our country of illegalls, commies and Marxists, thugs and criminals and whoever else is left who want to abolish our constitution and the rule of law.

158 posted on 11/30/2008 12:23:27 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Those faithless elector laws are meaningless.


159 posted on 11/30/2008 12:24:50 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Those faithless elector laws are meaningless.

The law is never meaningless, unless you're a Democrat.

160 posted on 11/30/2008 12:26:46 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson