Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pnh102
Why is it that courts in the USA routinely rule against the interests of US citizens?

It's more accurate to say that courts in the USA routinely rule in favor of the birth parents, regardless of citizenship.

5 posted on 12/01/2008 8:06:33 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (ACORN is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Constitutionalist Conservative

That means that you should always be prepared to surrender your child at the dictate of the courts if you choose to adopt.


9 posted on 12/01/2008 8:28:31 AM PST by weegee (Sec. of State Clinton. What kind of change is it to keep the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Oligarchy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
It's more accurate to say that courts in the USA routinely rule in favor of the birth parents, regardless of citizenship.

I know that in some states (New Jersey comes to mind) an adoption is pretty much final once birth parents choose to give up their children. I would hope that more states adopt such a model.

11 posted on 12/01/2008 10:31:31 AM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson