Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black
Didn’t the House and Senate almost put the Bush election (W, in 2000) into the Senate? I think they have their one Rep. (Boxer?) but could net get the Senator to match.

I don't believe so. The 2000 election hinged on who won Florida, and one candidate or the other was going to win it regardless. The House and Sente would have come in if both candidated had deadlocked at 269, or if a third candidate had taken one or more states so that nobody had 270 or more electoral votes.

87 posted on 12/01/2008 5:31:08 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
ME "Didn’t the House and Senate almost put the Bush election (W, in 2000) into the Senate? I think they have their one Rep. (Boxer?) but could net get the Senator to match."

YOU " I don't believe so. The 2000 election hinged on who won Florida, and one candidate or the other was going to win it regardless. The House and Senate would have come in if both candidated had deadlocked at 269, or if a third candidate had taken one or more states so that nobody had 270 or more electoral votes."

Sorry - I did a horrible job writing this up. What I meant was that in 2000 there was a SENATE seat that potentially could have gone have been disputed in the Senate. It was B1 Bob Dornan's re-election. Dornan tried, but the Senate refused to hear it. Sanchez won with thousands of illegal immigrant votes. The R's were too weak and gutless to challenge it, even though they had the majority (I believe).

Anyway, that's what I was trying to write about, not Bush V. Gore.

89 posted on 12/01/2008 8:22:02 PM PST by Jack Black (ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson