Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehrling

There’s this sticky little thing called an “ex post facto” law, that is also forbidden under the Constitution.


11 posted on 12/03/2008 8:20:26 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Great point!!!


27 posted on 12/03/2008 8:24:03 AM PST by IrishPennant (He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
Ex post facto regulations may not always apply to non-criminal matters.
38 posted on 12/03/2008 8:27:40 AM PST by stimulant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry

Ex Post Facto refers to criminal law, not simple legal definitions or standards. The Ex Post Facto ruling on Canal Zone citizenship is what gave McCain ‘natural born citizenship’ status re 8 U.S.C. §1403 which retroactively recognized canal zone citizenship. (the bill, passed in 1952 was made retroactive to Feb, 1904)


41 posted on 12/03/2008 8:28:00 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
There’s this sticky little thing called an “ex post facto” law, that is also forbidden under the Constitution.

Not under all circumstances, especially when someone is deriving a benefit & not being punished as a result of the ex post facto law.

113 posted on 12/03/2008 9:05:49 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry

Clinton aleady set the precedent with his retroactive tax increases


135 posted on 12/03/2008 9:28:41 AM PST by edzo4 (NoBama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson