The US Supreme Court put a stop to that selective bias. If it had proceeded the dems would have ‘found’ votes as they always do in close elections, and Gore would have been President.
The dems in 2000 tried to steal the election but were stopped. That is why to this day they say ‘Bush was Selected’ which is a lie. Bush was saved from dem voter fraud.
So your analogy is without merit.
Sorry but while your analysis of the 2000 election in Florida is pretty accurate, the point E-MC2 was making, the way I read it, is that the Republicans have won close elections, which is true. In fact we won the most important race, for president, in a close race.
I don't believe he commented on how, just that we won a close election. And he is correct.
You may be right. But I inferred he meant close races resulting in recounts.
The Minnesota race could be analogous if Franken were allowed to recount the counties where he holds a significant advantage, and no others.
The dem playbook is to let recounts be reported but hold back those counties where they have advantage. Then bring forth a plethora of ‘found’ sacks, boxes, defunct machines, misplaced batches, etc. of ballots that must be counted in order to ‘count every vote’. Ancillary actions are to challege ballots in ludicrous fashion, file lawsuits on voter disenfranchisement/intimidation, and change rules afterwards to suit their aims.
If the US Supreme Court had not intervened in Florida 2000, I am certain the dems would have stole the election and hence we would not be debating this.
You can’t point to Florida 2000 as a counterexample because the dems were stopped there. It just does not compare.