I think that she is going to be a significant player, said Gingrich during an interview on CBSs Face the Nation. But shes going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. Shes not going to be the de facto leader.Please notice that Gingrich said "Shes not going to be the de facto leader. (emphasis mine)
Thanks for your feedback and the kind words.
However, your analysis, in my opinion, is flawed.
Let me point out two significant errors you made:
First, you omitted the title of the Hill piece:
“Gingrich: Palin won’t be future GOP leader”
Second,I was not quoting Gingrich. I was paraphrasing.
He said she will not be a leader.
Tell me what does it mean not to be a “defacto” leader.
De facto means in reality or actually - regardless of lawful authority. Something generally accepted.
Well in that sense there can be no GOP leader without an election. So there can never be a defacto leader because the GOP leader will have to be elected.
However, will she be the actual leader?
I think she is now. Don’t you?
Gingrich was parsing sentences. He is a very intelligent man who is also a politician. It is one of those how white is white things.
Gingrich was hedging his bets so to speak. You have to read between the lines.
Once again, thanks for the kind words.
But shes going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. Shes not going to be the de facto leader.
This comment is stupid no matter how you quote him. If we had 20 or 30 people in our party that will be “players” on the level Palin is, we wouldn’t be in this mess.