1 posted on
12/05/2008 11:16:10 AM PST by
steve-b
To: steve-b
"donor-financed duds."
I thought this was a thread about bad ammo.
2 posted on
12/05/2008 11:22:33 AM PST by
Paladin2
(No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
To: steve-b
Yet, all mainstream media had to talk about was Sarah’s duds. How’s that for blatant biasness against Sarah?
3 posted on
12/05/2008 11:27:44 AM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: steve-b
Well, thank goodness this "watchdog group" is on top of this. The country may have elected an illegal alien to the Presidency, but at least the clothes are legit.
Illegal dude - OK
Illegals duds - No Way.
To: steve-b
Campaign duds are an important issue that has been pushed to the back burner by the petty citizenship issue. Can’t we all just get dressed, and move along?
7 posted on
12/05/2008 12:08:49 PM PST by
pallis
To: steve-b
Sanchez's campaign spending about $189 on "meeting clothing" for SanchezYea, but bought at Goodwill
Street value $13,000.
9 posted on
12/05/2008 1:00:02 PM PST by
Syncro
(Tagline goes here)
To: steve-b
No kidding!? I am so surprised! Campaigns paying for the candidates make-up and clothes. Because Obama, Hillary!, Kerry and Bore all paid it themselves!!! NOT.
10 posted on
12/05/2008 2:34:53 PM PST by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson