Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network

But at this time, the market is not being permitted to work things out. For that to be happening, I would have to have the option to purchase no-ethanol fuel - - but I can’t because of a command-and-control Federal mandate. Even better, I would have the option to purchase 90-10 made from sugar cane or 90-10 made from corn; I would buy the sugar cane brew, but for political reasons I’m not likely to have that option any time soon.

So, competition, my foot.


16 posted on 12/06/2008 9:31:26 AM PST by jay1949 (Work is the curse of the blogging class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: jay1949

If they really think we should have ethanol for fuel, try sugar beets - but first lets make ‘em use the ethanol they produce as fuel for the distillation process. And do it all without subsidies.


75 posted on 12/06/2008 7:21:58 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson