Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot

Here is what you said in Post #20....

“What we need is for as many members of Congress as possible to show us they have some... courage.”

AND THUS, that’s why I said do you think you’re going to get those “many members” from that Democrat Congress.... LOL...

It didn’t work for the impeachment of Bill Clinton and it’s certainly not going to work for getting Obama out of office, since the Democrats want him in office...


56 posted on 12/09/2008 5:05:03 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

Hugh Hewitt pooh-poohed a caller a few minutes ago. Hugh called this story an internet rumor and hurried to disconnect the guy.


57 posted on 12/09/2008 5:12:44 PM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

“...that’s why I said do you think you’re going to get those “many members” from that Democrat Congress.... LOL...”

Sounds like you may be behind the curve on this.
VP Cheney will act as the President of the Senate at the Jan 8 joint session. And the session has one purpose, counting the electoral votes.

All it takes is a single team of one Senator and one Representative to present an Objection to O’s qualification. In such event, O’s reps may or may not respond by producing evidence clearly proving O is a natural born citizen. Obviously, it would be more desirable to base any Objection on clear evidence O is not a natural born citizen.

If upon consideration of the evidence the Objection is sustained by a majority, the matter is concluded and VP elect Biden serves as acting Pres until a Pres shall be qualified. Such a vote is not inconceivable. For example, if Obama becomes entangled in criminal circumstances many Dems may see Hillary as a better choice.

If Obama has not produced acceptable evidence and the Objection is defeated by a majority of Dems, the argument will be the Dems have in essence improperly amended the Constitution, by ignoring its clear language and adopting an impermissble result.

That will likely (had better!) initiate a request for USSC review.


64 posted on 12/09/2008 6:07:27 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson