Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fractal Trader
Hmm...and no mention that these pictures are criminal, as in child pornography?

Under New Hampshire law, [Rockingham County Attorney Jim Reams] said, students disseminating an inappropriate photo of someone under 16 can be considered to be distributing child pornography. Come January, the threshhold in New Hampshire goes to 18.

I'm quite surprised that kids today would do this. I thought they were supposed to be "tech savvy". I mean, isn't it pretty easy for those cellphone pics to get on the Internet?

Aren't they worried about that?

17 posted on 12/10/2008 11:35:03 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FourtySeven
I'm quite surprised that kids today would do this. I thought they were supposed to be "tech savvy".

They know how to use technology yes.

They are however still teenagers. Teenagers do not now and never have thought much about the consequences of their actions unless warned repeatedly and firmly by their parents.

These warnings by parents usually are most effective if previous warnings that went ignored were followed up by swift and sure punishment.

Too often today parents do not follow through on their warnings.

48 posted on 12/10/2008 11:53:14 AM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson