[DaveyB]

Another attack the messenger in order to avoid the truth of the message. The findings that the COLB is a forgery is not based on only on what one expert said, but on many, many published discrepancies. (There are also many experts who agree that the document is forged - if it matters) If one wants to debunk the forgery charge they must debunk the myriad of anomalies that have been discovered. This amounts to an ad hominem On Dr Polaik and WND but is no way a rebuttal against the charge!

[curiosity]

There are also many experts who agree that the document is forged

Name them.

[Nipfan]

“There are also many experts who agree that the document is forged - if it matters”

It matters a great deal. We’ve only ever heard about two detailed examinations and one of these, Techdude’s, has been discredited. So it would be very, very helpful in carrying on this argument to have corroboration of Polarik’s findings.