[JimRed]

These individuals can afford bodyguards, and it does not make sense to hang out anywhere you’re likely to need a gun!

That said, if everyone carried we’d be safer. There’d also be darned few “law abiding” citizens left in NYC. Hardly anyone can get a carry permit there.

[Copernicus]

These individuals can afford bodyguards, and it does not make sense to hang out anywhere you’re likely to need a gun!

So Big Burly Guy Party of the First Part pays Big Burly Guy Party of the Second Part to carry a gun for him and wimpers like a little girl whenever he is in a d-d-d-dangerous part of town by himself.

Got it!

Best regards,

[Copernicus]

These individuals can afford bodyguards, and it does not make sense to hang out anywhere you’re likely to need a gun!

So Big Burly Guy Party of the First Part pays Big Burly Guy Party of the Second Part to carry a gun for him and wimpers like a little girl whenever he is in a d-d-d-dangerous part of town by himself.

Got it!

Best regards,

[SnakeDoctor]

>> These individuals can afford bodyguards, and it does not make sense to hang out anywhere you’re likely to need a gun!

Ah — the ever-present “bodyguard capability” clause of the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd amendment applies even to those that can afford bodyguards, and especially to those that venture into areas where they’re “likely to need a gun”.

SnakeDoc

[School of Rational Thought]

Let me get you up to speed.

Violence can happen anywhere.