Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CutePuppy
Emphatic "NO". TARP (idea and program) was never meant to "bail out" investors in failed financial institutions, only to inject liquidity to banks to unfreeze credit markets and loan activity, and protect depositors and assets in them from "run on the bank" - sort of like oversized FDIC, because FDIC had no authority or resources to do anything of the sort.

And yet that bail out fund is now going to be tapped to bail out unions, I mean auto companies... It does NOT matter what the claim was for TARP they got their grubby hands on 700 billion dollars and power to guide and control economy. For whatever reason this bunch as already changed their minds in how they will USE the money.

Now come on campaign 2010 and 1012 are already in the works and LIBERALS are the top of the intellectual charts in getting 'government' dollars to fund their campaigns.

13 posted on 12/15/2008 3:47:22 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
And Social Security "lockbox" is used for general expenses fund, and Highway maintenance funds are "borrowed" against for "education expenses" (i.e. Teachers Union), and [reclassified] Military funds are used for construction works, etc. etc.

When politicians get a hold of a pot of money, they'll find ways to use it for the unintended purposes. That doesn't mean that the money was not needed for what was intended in the first place. Congress can just as easily "create" / spend "new money" for UAW bailout by voting to spend any amount, whether TARP was there to take it from or not - they just use TARP because it's easy to use class warfare and tell people that they are taking it from "fat cat Wall Street bailout fund" to help save American hard-working union jobs... would not be the first time Democrats misrepresent or misname something?

BTW, Bush Says Auto Bailout Is Not Ready

He had been asked when he might make an anticipated announcement about tapping a $700 billion financial industry bailout fund to aid General Motors , Ford Motor and Chrysler LLC.

Asked whether he was leaning toward using financial bailout funds, Bush said: "I signaled that that's a possibility."

In any case, I don't see how any of this would apply to "investors" in Madoff or any of these funds, in any way, shape or form. They are not part of banking system that is regulated by or has to borrow from Fed to make consumer or commercial loans.

19 posted on 12/15/2008 4:23:22 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson