Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bernie Madoff's Victims: The List
Silicon Valley Insider ^ | 12/14/08 | Henry Blodget

Posted on 12/15/2008 6:25:20 AM PST by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 last
To: cynicalman

Bernie was a marketmaker for probably most NASDAQ stocks. His traders would make a market in the stock so when you would place your online trade, they would offer to sell you say 100 shares of Apple at $55.12. This is all in real time with thousands of trades often per minute.

5 years ago - His market making firm might buy your 100 shares at say 55 1/4 and quickly sell it for 55 3/8s. This is the spread and this is how his firm made money.

5 years ago decimalization came in and shares were quote in pennies like $55.03 versus $55 1/16. The spread shrunk a LOT and so did profitability.

This is when I think Bernie went bad unless he already was bad.

Ok frontrunning. Bernie’s traders could have seen 1,000 shares of Apple being bought at $55 1/4 and they jump in front and buy at $55 1/8. They could jump in the from of the line and buy or sell to make their clients money while SCREWING you and I placing trades online or anybody making a trade - could be Smith Barney. The practice is illegal. Bernie’s firm as marketmaker could see the “order flow” which is like getting a 20 second advanced video on a football game to allow you to adjust your team on the field. So on every transaction/trade Bernie could pick up an extra $100 or $1000 bucks on each trade.

His investing supposedly involved lots of trades. So if he was front running his clients might make $200 on a trade and you lost $200 on your online trade you made in Apple. Multiply this by say 10,000 trades a day and it adds up.

So many of his clients thought Bernie had this edge. A lot knew his edge was cheating. I think this is how it worked up to 5 years ago before prices went to pennies and the spreads vanished. He may have gone dirty about 5 years ago. He may have still been making say 5 to 6% a year on his strategy for the clients and paying out 11 to 15%. This still worked because most of his clients left their money in. In addition, more money was still coming in which is the key to a Ponzi scheme.


161 posted on 12/15/2008 12:24:12 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

It’s hard to cheat an honest person.

Thanks for your insight.


162 posted on 12/15/2008 2:15:19 PM PST by Nokia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Nokia

Thanks. Not too many news stories are mentioning how Bernie’s clients thought Bernie had an edge. He was well known as a marketmaker in stocks.

I am not sure if he let on or if it was a wink and a nod but a lot of clients knew Bernie’s “edge” was front running or the idea that it was frontrunning.


163 posted on 12/15/2008 2:44:27 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You sound like a democrat. Again Madoff crapping away a bunch of rich DNC donors money is nothing but a pure joy to watch. HAHAHAHAHAHA


164 posted on 12/15/2008 2:48:07 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast (The DNC and Rino's: they put the CON into congress everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 7mmMag@LeftCoast

You cannot cheat an honest man.


165 posted on 12/15/2008 2:50:48 PM PST by BooBoo1000 (Some times I wake up grumpy, other times I let her sleep/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Solson
Thank you for injecting some reason and some class into this hate-fest. I feel for all the people, institutions, charities and funds, who invested with this POS and now are worrying that their money is all gone. They don't deserve it.

I have a friend who a few months ago found out that a different POS had stolen the $250k they had invested with him. People who believe in someone and are wrong are not necessarily bad people. My friends are devastated, it was everything they had saved over the past 10 years of hard work. It was also a Ponzi scheme. The fact that they hoped for good returns does not mean that they deserved it.

166 posted on 12/15/2008 3:11:23 PM PST by Defiant (I for one welcome our new Obama Overlords.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: BooBoo1000
You cannot cheat an honest man.

That is demonstrably false.

167 posted on 12/15/2008 3:18:03 PM PST by Defiant (I for one welcome our new Obama Overlords.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

looks like a lot of supposedly smart people were gaming the system. Hard to find much symphathy.


168 posted on 12/15/2008 3:29:17 PM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I'll work up sympathy when I see some of these investors holding squeegees at freeway exits!


169 posted on 12/15/2008 3:35:26 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giobruno
It looks like a who’s who list of wealthy donors to the Democrat Party.

Thats because it is. I have no sympathy for these people.

170 posted on 12/15/2008 6:44:44 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

These are not greedy sacks of crap, and most of them did not know that madof was doing things illegally. I think you actually have no idea what he was doing. Madof was taking the money from his investors, then sending them falsified reports of what he was doing with their investments. If they actually KNEW what he was doing, they would have pulled their money out immediately. So, these people ARE victims, and they DO deserve sympathy. The next time you want to provide commentary on a developing storyu, make sure you actually know what you are talking about before you post, otherwise (like right now) you look like an idiot.


171 posted on 03/16/2009 10:41:06 AM PDT by TheVoiceOfReason13 (they ARE victims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheVoiceOfReason13

Lost a bit of money, did you?

I have seen NOTHING in subsequent reporting regarding this issue which makes me change my mind about the “victims”. As I said, if it seems too good to be true (and his claimed returns on investments certainly seemed too good to be true) then it IS too good to be true.

Also, in the future, please limit your comments to stories which were posted sometime this year.


172 posted on 03/16/2009 11:24:45 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson