Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sammy67

There will be limits on possession. Unstamped ammo will be illegal to possess with criminal penalty. Per bullet taxes will be imposed to pay for the government directory and registration of ammo. Only ammo can be purchased and possessed for each registered firearm. The list of states and the proposed laws are documented on the Gun Owners of America website.

People, these proposed laws are dangerous. They were tried last year, and maybe the year before. Language on every state bill is almost identical. This is a national effort to undermine the 2nd Amendment.

The people behind this effort are commies.


12 posted on 12/15/2008 7:55:37 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: o_zarkman44
The people behind this effort are commies.

The people behind this are the Venture Capitalists in Washington State who funded the guys that have the patent on ammunition encoding

14 posted on 12/15/2008 8:10:38 AM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: o_zarkman44
There will be limits on possession. Unstamped ammo will be illegal to possess with criminal penalty.

Right, and then everyone who (was) law abiding will say screw it and ignore every gun law instead of just that one in particular.

I can just imagine the proliferation of sawed off shotguns and home converted automatic weapons.

Speaking of which, how the hell will they stamp shotgun rounds??

15 posted on 12/15/2008 8:11:06 AM PST by Centurion2000 (To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: o_zarkman44
Define “keep and bear arms”.

I think our understanding of “Arms”, common as well as legal, includes not only the bullet launcher itself, but all the requisite commodities to actually “use” the arm.

Ammunition, components to reload, tools to do so, accessories all may well fall into the definition of “keeping and bearing arms”. Not all in government eschew the idea the the 2A in fact, is the peoples recourse to tyranny-as well as insurance against foreign invasion; those that can and do read the founding documents, and desire to uphold it.

I think the SCOTUS would agree. Of course, given a farther left lean, the SCOTUS could even declare the USCONS “unconstitutional”.

God Bless & MOLON LABE.

24 posted on 12/15/2008 9:22:04 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret) "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson