Replies

NOBODY has EVER suggested that I am doing ANYTHING that is an "affront" to the unborn. ~ Wagglebee

And now I have ~ MovementConservative

And still, NOBODY has EVER suggested that Wagglebee is doing ANYTHING that is an "affront" to the unborn. NOBODY. That's who.

MC, you really have no idea what it means to be pro-life. You cannot be both pro-life and pro-euthanasia.

You speak corruptly about pursuing God's plan, as if to suggest that God wants us to commit the most egregious of sins.

It's true that we don't KNOW what your opinion on suicide is, but I'm going to guess it's relatively close to your statements on the subject. Why would you bother expressing opinions that you don't believe?

Just so you'll know, for future reference, Free Republic is a pro-life forum. Wagglebee's contribution to the pro-life movement is and has been substantial. He's not going to surrender to your agenda. So you may as well hang it up, before you make such an ass of yourself that you either get zotted, or crawl away with your tail between your legs.

I stand behind my position that equating the holocaust of abortion with suicide dimishes the voiceless who never had a chance to be born. When has an unborn baby ever chosen to be killed?
There is not one principle Jim Robinson listed in his "Statement by the founder of Free Republic" post on March 22, 2004 that I am not not in total agreement with. So no, I doubt I will be getting zotted or going away with my tail between my legs anytime soon.

As for the insults you hurl at me, that's a nice touch. Kinda tells me all I need to know about that person.

FYI, I have included the applicable section from Jim's post that details what FR is. Notice you will find direct reference to opposing abortion. Pro-Life=anti-abortion. If you want to read more into it, go ahead. Here it is for your reference.

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.

> You cannot be both pro-life and pro-euthanasia.

Interesting. I’ve never given any serious thought about pro-or-anti-euthanasia, and certainly never thought of it in the same context as pro-life.

Why can’t you be pro-life and pro-euthanasia at the same time? What is the ethical and moral linkage?

Note that I’m not disagreeing with what you’ve said: I’m seeking to understand the issue.

(I prefer to describe myself as anti-abortion)