[drjimmy]

If a person does not use that argument, then bringing it up to argue against it is a straw argument.

Posts #3, 10, 17, 29, 39, 59, 77, 95 on this thread alone have used the argument that the Supreme Court must be corrupt for denying to hear this case. Dozens of comments on other threads concerning this issue over the past couple of weeks have said the same thing.

[Kevmo]

Posts #3, 10, 17, 29, 39, 59, 77, 95 on this thread alone have used the argument that the Supreme Court must be corrupt for denying to hear this case.
***BZZZT, wrong. We are directly in lineage back to post #3 which says they’re gunshy, not corrupt. Take your argument where it exists, not where you want it to exist.