“They lack courage” is always a nice fallback. Never can be that there is no substance to a charge. “Lacking courage” is corruption, BTW.
Maybe you can help? Please inform the rest of us how you know there is no substance to the charge? Obviously, you have proof that others of us have missed.
If not, the fact is that there are a zillion swirling honest questions with no proof to be found. Some of us seemingly care more about upholding the Constitution than others. Apparently.
“They lack courage” is always a nice fallback.
***Let’s see, I criticize your reasoning process and you approve of mine. You should re-examine your thinking process with respect to this issue.
Never can be that there is no substance to a charge.
***Never can be that there is sense to that sentence.
“Lacking courage” is corruption, BTW.
***Straw argument. Lacking Courage is Lacking Courage. Corruption is Corruption. Your argument was against the strawman you built up for corruption, and this is an attempt to equate lack of courage with corruption so that your argument sticks. Maybe you should just start arguing cogently rather than falling back on classic fallacies and trying to defend them. If I go through your other arguments on the CertifiGate scandal, will I find lots of other classic fallacies, making your entire position untenable?
AFAIK, no court has ruled that way though. They've thrown out cases based on lack of "standing", on "time is not ripe", on "Not the job of whover is being sued" etc, and other essentially procedural grounds. Not one has request it's own certified copy of the Certificate or Certification of Live Birth, which they could do as courts of competent jurisdiction.