You said — “The vetting argument is irrelevant and you can argue it all day long. It does not change the fact he is probably ineligible to hold office.”
The fact of the matter is that you *do not know* — and that’s a problem of the vetting process. So, the *real problem* is that the vetting process is defective and needs to be corrected.
As I said before — it appears that not very many people are concerned about the “process” — but actually more concerned about knocking out Obama, specifically.
If you’re concerned about the Constitution (and not some individual, solitary candidate) then you’ll be concerned — primarily — about the process...
No sh!t sherlock...no one knows until the eligibility issue is resolved, thats the whole frickin issue. Save the vetting law for another thread, they do nothing to answer the question at hand.
Is he Constitutionally eligible or not?