In this circumstance, politics and winning elections don’t mean a thing. To some of us, the Constitution is what matters here. This isn’t about ANY of the things you are talking about. Principle towers over party, politics OR elections. Sheesh.
You said — “Principle towers over party, politics OR elections. Sheesh.”
Well, no matter how true you think this is (and I’m not really saying that it’s wrong from a legal or moral standpoint) — the whole point of the matter is that you’re talking to yourself, unless you get a mass of people “on board” with you, on these same principles. If you don’t you’re simply “fringe element” with the rest who won’t get on board with you. That’s simply *reality*... unfortunately...
That’s why many here are being portrayed as kooks and “fringe” and conspiracy-minded. You simply haven’t gotten the rest “on board” with you...
AND, by the way, that’s not going to happen in regards to Obama’s qualifications to be President in January. You don’t have the ability or the time to get enough people on board to make any difference at all.
HOWEVER, if it’s not Obama that you’re concerned about — but rather — the *real wrong* here. Then you will have the time and ability to get people “on board” with you. The “real wrong” here is that the “process” of vetting a candidate failed us (and failed the Constitution). That’s the real wrong (not Obama; he’s merely a symptom of the problem...).
So, work on the state legislation to vet candidates and you’ll have the ability and enough time to get people on board to correct the “wrong and deficient process...”