[South40]

We’re apparently supposed to beleive that if we are attacked Bush will be free from blame even if our attackers came across our open borders during Jorge’s term.

[Jane Austen]

That’s it.

[Sudetenland]

Whatever his failures in border control (and they are legion), none of them have been linked to terrorist attacks because there have been no successful terrorist attacks.

There have been many attempts, but no one has succeeded in executing an attack. No one would have made that bet in the aftermath of 9/11/2001.

Credit where credit is due. Bush has succeeded beyond anyone's wildest imaginings at preventing another 9/11 on his watch.

Your admonition, however warranted, does not in any way negate that success. If it does occur as a result of those who illegally immigrated to America on his watch, then you can complain. Otherwise you are indulging in BDS hysteria and intellectual dishonesty in denying him that credit.

[Erik Latranyi]

We’re apparently supposed to beleive that if we are attacked Bush will be free from blame even if our attackers came across our open borders during Jorge’s term.

First, there are many who have openly advertised our open borders to our enemies while complaining about the NY Times advertising our military strategy to those same enemies.

Second, the advertised open borders have not been exploited by our enemies in 8 years so it is now spun as a negative.

Liberals would be proud of the posts around here.