Lying down with dogs does not make a lawyer a flea. That's where you and I differ. It's a matter of degree, not an absolute doomsday prediction. Lighten up. See post 128.
Maybe you should lighten up. I’m not being that tough on you. Your reasoning is still specious though. It assumes that judges and justices are too dumb to look at the case before them and judge it on its merits. That they will look up the cases the attorney before them has represented and make assumptions about the case they are hearing based on an association with a past client/case. If that is the case our entire legal system is an exercise in futility from the get go.