Berg was an attorney for the truthers. Basically he was doing what attorneys do. I heard an interview with him a while back and he was asked if he believed what the Truthers did. His answer was basically “Not necessarily”.
How is Berg following the directive of clients who lost loved ones on 911 changing anything regarding Obama’s stonewalling and ineligibility?
Perhaps you would like to explain for us how Berg's past cases change the fact that Obama’s father was a British citizen thus Obama lacked parents who were Anmerican citizens and is thus not natural born, and Obama has refused to reveal any of the documentation of his adult life and his actual certificate of birth wherever he was born?
You trying to assassinate Phil Berg's character in no way changes the facts and lack of regard for the Constitution Obama is gaming for yet another affirmative action benefit.
Phil Berg is proof positive that Harvard Law produces D-minus students, too.
Wasn’t Berg just a lawyer for a 911 truther? Would you cast guilt on all lawyers for what their plantiffs did or didn’t do or what the plantiff may believe?
Yeah, that’s a pretty ugly and hateful rant against Bush and Cheney coming from Berg. Who the hell does he think he is, a CoastToCoastAM host?.
So it is better to “kill” the messenger than the message???
Just about zero Freepers care if he's a truther
We care more about about Obama's eligibility
You should be going after 0 not after Berg
1. Please, does anyone know?
2. NOTE: Forget about Justice Ginsberg, because I don't think she would have the courage to even try. She probably would be just as happy to remain in the dark forever than to bring light to the room by replacing the burnt-out light bulb with a new one.
3. My own amateurish answer: It obviously only takes one justice, but the 9 Supreme Court justices don't know for sure, because they are afraid to stick their necks out and make a critical decision on the issue of how many justices are needed to screw in a light bulb.
NOTE: Feel free to offer your own answer as to how many Supreme Court justices it would take to screw in a light bulb.