Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kenneth Starr to defend gay marriage ban before state Supreme Court
Los Angeles Times ^ | 3:07 PM, December 19, 2008 | Jessica Garrison

Posted on 12/19/2008 6:31:58 PM PST by granite

Kenneth W. Starr, the former U.S. Solicitor General who led the inquiry into President Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica L. Lewinsky, will argue the case in favor of upholding a ban on gay marriage before the California Supreme Court.

Starr was today named lead counsel for the official proponents of Proposition 8. This afternoon, the group filed court briefs defending the legality of the proposition, which was approved by 52% of California voters last month throwing into question thousands of marriages performed during the five months the practice was legal in the state.

The briefs are in response to a spate of legal challenges filed by gay rights advocates, including the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2008election; casupremecourt; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; jessicagarrison; kenstarr; lavendermafia; losangelestimes; perverts; prop8; proposition8; queerlybeloved; starr; traditionalmarriage; yeson8

1 posted on 12/19/2008 6:31:58 PM PST by granite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: granite

Hell, we just lost the effort. Ken will get lost on his way to court.


2 posted on 12/19/2008 6:35:31 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granite
Starr was today named lead counsel for the official proponents of Proposition 8.

It's not "Prop 8" any more, it's a part of the California constitution. State courts have to uphold their state constitutions, not void it. Are they going to declare their properly-amended constitution "unconstitutional"?

Plaintiffs should have been laughed out of court, and the groups that successfully amended the state constitution should not be forced to defend itself again against this ridiculous suit.

But "everybody knows" a judge is superior to the state or federal constitution he swore to uphold.

3 posted on 12/19/2008 6:51:01 PM PST by 300winmag (Life is hard! It is even harder when you are stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granite

What’s to defend? The law is the law. We don’t need any champion to take up our cause and pretend the matter needs further debate by our betters in some courtroom. The only question remaining is whether the rule of law still governs, the state constitution is still worthy of the name, and the people are still sovereign - or whether judges are now co-regents ruling over Californians.

I say wait in silence to see whether these judges will submit to the law and whether the executive will execute it. And if they won’t, march en masse on the governer’s office and demand that laws be enforced, and march on the capitol and demand the removal of usurpers and lawbreakers from the bench.


4 posted on 12/19/2008 7:01:20 PM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granite

A lot of these “grand attorneys” are like trying to swim after substituting an anchor for your life preserver. Their job is to throw the game, while making it look like they’re working on your behalf, yet without leaving evidence of having thrown the game.

Starr, especially. If you were truly hated by the government, like Timothy McVeigh, and being defended by some mall lawyer who worked out of a trailer, Ken Starr would show up to “take over” and work pro bono for you. Everybody would be so in awe of him, that they would agree.

However, you might have a chance with the mall lawyer—you won’t with Starr. It’s his job to make sure you end up in the electric chair. The mall lawyer might accidentally hit a home run and get you acquitted, and that can’t be permitted. And the government does not like leaving such things to chance.

Look at Bill Clinton. A mall lawyer prosecuting him could have had Bill wearing county pajamas before sundown, probably facing 200 counts of the most heinous crimes Bill committed. Instead, good ol’ Ken Starr would only charge him with a charge so stupid and embarrassing, it would guarantee he would walk. And Ken Starr also ran up the tab and ran out the clock in doing it.

They kept bragging about Ken Starr’s “attention to detail”, which mostly amounted to him keeping precise tabs on his expense accounts.


5 posted on 12/19/2008 7:13:30 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granite

8 is going down. I know a setup when I see one.


6 posted on 12/19/2008 7:20:04 PM PST by LiberConservative ("No. I'm sorry. I still can't see upstate from my house")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granite

I look forward to reading the arguments. The pro-Prop 8 folks asked Kenneth Starr to represent them. This is going to be quite the case to observe and study; and it will be high profile. This is good.


7 posted on 12/19/2008 7:37:28 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
State courts have to uphold their state constitutions, not void it. Are they going to declare their properly-amended constitution "unconstitutional"?

Some learned quite clearly, that after CA's Prop 209 was passed by majority; local governmental bodies declared they were NOT going to obey parts of the state's constitution they, personally, disagreed with. D-Bill Lockyer is quoted saying exactly that, back then.

And in fact, local public entities had to be taken to COURT in order to enforce the State Constitutionality of Proposition 209.

Over. And over again.

Supporters of Prop 8 need to find out where to begin, immediately, sending financial support to in re lawyers defending the state's constitution.

I suspect Barack's people have already decided who will be the legal shadow group of the anti-Prop 8 legal team. Former President Clinton used the Office of Civil Rights Commission as such a shadow support to fight Prop 209. And, BO's line-up appears to be happening quite quickly. It's really just slightly different, tactically, from Bill Clinton's.

8 posted on 12/19/2008 7:43:58 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: granite; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BabaOreally; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

The opponents of natural law will never give up until they are stopped by a superior force. Of some kind.

9 posted on 12/19/2008 8:10:00 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Hell, we just lost the effort. Ken will get lost on his way to court.

Truly disgusting...

Not YOU!

Starr is truly incompetent.

10 posted on 12/19/2008 8:21:25 PM PST by JDoutrider (Heading to Galt's Gulch... It is time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: granite
Kenneth W. Starr, the former U.S. Solicitor General who led the inquiry into President Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica L. Lewinsky,...

That's funny. I thought he was investigating perjury and obstruction of justice committed against Paula Jones?

Oh, I see, it's the L.A. Times. Truth optional.

11 posted on 12/19/2008 8:45:52 PM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Their job is to throw the game, while making it look like they’re working on your behalf, yet without leaving evidence of having thrown the game.

That sounds a lot like Patrick Fitzgerald.

12 posted on 12/19/2008 8:50:22 PM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider

Afraid so...


13 posted on 12/19/2008 8:55:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: granite

Hope he does a better job on this one.


14 posted on 12/19/2008 10:15:50 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Its just as well with the State Of California siding against the people with the radical gay lobby. It wouldn't surprise me if the California Supreme Court threw out Proposition 8. The vote of the people don't count for much in California, if the elites don't like the way they voted. And they don't.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

15 posted on 12/19/2008 10:30:30 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I don’t know how they can do that. That’s why it’s a constitutional amendment, so that the court cannot throw it out.


16 posted on 12/19/2008 11:11:38 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Forty years ago, you may have been right. We live in a different country now and everything we hold dear is under relentless attack. Even our vote no longer matters. Those in power do what they want regardless of how we vote.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 12/19/2008 11:21:02 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“It wouldn’t surprise me if the California Supreme Court threw out Proposition 8. The vote of the people don’t count for much in California, if the elites don’t like the way they voted. And they don’t.”

The same for the rest of the country too. The courts and our “elected” officials don’t give a dang what we serfs think and want. The only use we serfs have to them is to pay taxes (whatever amount the elite think we should), pay their salaries and perks, and feed their narcissistic egos by having power over us.


18 posted on 12/20/2008 3:36:39 AM PST by proudofthesouth (In spite of what's going on in the world, God is still in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: granite

“Kenneth Starr to defend gay marriage ban before state Supreme Court”

This man is one of the few in our time with intestinal fortitude, otherwise known as “guts”. He took the flack for trying to bring Clinton to justice. The guy is brave. He’s right, too, again.


19 posted on 12/20/2008 4:30:12 AM PST by RoadTest (By their fruits shall ye know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson