Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XR7

I think it would have been in their best interest to have a broader product line.
If they had more high MPG cars during the gasoline price spikes they could’ve ramped up production on those pretty quickly and help mitigate the losses they sustained.
As it was they had a bunch of $40,000+ SUVs that got less than 18 MPG while we had $4.00/gallon gas.
They took a major hit from that swing in consumer buying.
They have to hedge against wild price swings like that.


9 posted on 12/24/2008 7:30:09 AM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brett66

“I think it would have been in their best interest to have a broader product line.”

I don’t think it would have helped. There were plenty of high (32+MPG) cars on the dealers lots. The problem was that no one wanted to buy the gashog trade-in.

BTW, about the only thing that GM was making a profit on was the ‘gashogs’, those 40K+ cars. They were at best breaking even on the high mileage cars.

So you were faced with tightening credit, reduced trade-in value, and an inability of the dealers to lower prices on their high mileage/low profit margin vehicles.

A different mix of models on the show room would not have affected any of that.


41 posted on 12/24/2008 7:58:23 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson