To: NeoConfederate
I guess "religious speech" is about as close to Christianity as I would go with Rick Warren... For someone in his position to be nearly in opposition to publicly state that Jesus Christ is the only way to God... that isn't much of a Christian. In fact, when I heard that Warren was selected for this, I was not surprised at all. Obama "needed" someone who represents "Christians" to balance out his invitation to the American Gay and Lesbian Band Association for a performance in the inauguration parade (you know the group - one of the regular and popular acts of the annual Decadence Parade - the homosexual "showcase" of debauchery).
And any guesses if the name of Jesus Christ is even used in Warren's speech? I figure Obama won't have to review Warren's words... they won't be threatening to him in any substantial way...
9 posted on
12/24/2008 1:37:25 PM PST by
TheBattman
(Pray for our country....)
To: TheBattman
In any event, ‘Pastor’ Warren will do as his ‘congregant’ tells him to do beacuse Rick wouldn’t risk losing the ‘attention position’.
11 posted on
12/24/2008 1:39:16 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: TheBattman
Sources on this? I may not know as much about Warren as I should....?
12 posted on
12/24/2008 1:41:09 PM PST by
humantech
("No one wants to live to see such evil times. Its what you do with the time you are given")
To: TheBattman
If he does not use the words “Jesus Christ” anywhere in his sermon, that will do him in as far as I'm concerned. We can compromise a lot now days but to deny the Lord is out of the question.
13 posted on
12/24/2008 1:44:30 PM PST by
fish hawk
(Atheism is a non-prophet organization)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson