Yes, that’s true. However, from the perspective of the victims, it’s random. Many people go through nasty divorces, almost no one expects this. No one sits around thinking “what are the odds that my nasty ex-husband will shoot up the Christmas Eve party?” but I’m sure you know that.
As for the last part, that’s the ideal situation but it would take the perception and skill of a spectacular, nearly mythical hero. There is a shortage of them in the real world.
“Many people go through nasty divorces, almost no one expects this. No one sits around thinking “what are the odds that my nasty ex-husband will shoot up the Christmas Eve party?””
Maybe they should think, “ what are the chances that the poor SOB that was totally ripped off and made to pay beyond his means and true responsibility going to do to me and my family for lying and painting him as a demon?”
Some times the dishonesty used against people can come back to haunt them beyond their wildest nightmares.
People can lie and crucify people in the legal system and never suffer for it. Not saying that is what happened in this case, but there is always the possibility.
But what if that ex-husband has issued death threats in the past and the state refused to fire him from his job as a state trooper and an “investigation” suggested iit was an abuse of power for the Givernor to even suggest that such a person be fired...