Posted on 12/29/2008 5:33:54 AM PST by Kaslin
What does Caroline Kennedy have in common with black America? If your answer is not much, I'd tend to agree with you.
When I think of Caroline, I think of Manhattan and Park Avenue, not the Bronx and Brooklyn. I think of Brentwood and Beverly Hills, not Watts and South Central Los Angeles.
But there is something that Caroline and black America do have in common. The Democratic Party.
Whether Kennedy succeeds in her effo rt to slide into Hillary Clinton's soon-to-be-vacated Senate seat will have little to do with her Democratic Party bona fides. Per her policy positions ticked off the other day, she is in perfect and predictable liberal alignment with party boilerplate. If she fails, it will be for reasons other than her views.
So what exactly is the common political ground that Kennedy bluebloods share with the 90 percent of America's blacks who vote for Democrats?
A careful look shows the deep internal contradictions of the Democratic Party and the complexity of the political psyche of black Americans.
Ironically, despite Democratic Party rhetoric about economic inequities and wealth and income gaps in America, those gaps are more pronounced inside the Democratic tent than inside the Republican one.
According to exit polls from November's election, Barack Obama captured the vote of America' richest and America's poorest. Fifty-two percent of those with incomes over $200,000 voted for Obama and more than 60 percent of those earning under $30,000 did.
Our wealthiest senator, John Kerry, is a Democrat, as is our wealthiest House member, Jane Harman.
The nation's two wealthiest men, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are both, by all indication, Democrats.
What political aspirations can black Americans, whose median income lags the nation's share with these multimillionaires and billionaires?
There is little common ground regarding values.
Church attendance correlates reliably over time with party affiliation, and this remained true in this last election. Those who attend church frequently vote Republican. Those who don't usually vote Democratic. Except blacks.
Blacks, in fact, have the highest church attendance in the country. Seventy-six percent of black Democrats attend church at least monthly. Sixty-seven perce nt of Republicans do and 50 percent of white Democrats do.
A recent Gallup poll shows blacks more aligned with Republicans than Democrats on social issues -- moral acceptability of homosexuality, abortion, and sexual promiscuity.
On energy and environmental issues, blacks poll more closely with conservatives than with liberals. It's because these are pocketbook issues. Working blacks have little interest in paying the higher taxes and bearing the higher costs that will result from chasing global warming windmills and displacing cheap hydrocarbon energy with exotic government-subsidized alternatives. Lower energy costs also put blacks on the side of offshore drilling for oil and gas.
How about education? Wealthy liberals, despite having their own kids in private schools, oppose school choice. When a black family is given the opportunity to pull its child out of a failing public school and send him or her to a church school or another alternative, they are grateful.
So where's the common ground? Income redistribution. A recent Zogby poll shows 80 percent of Democrats, 90 percent of liberals, and 76 percent of blacks supporting taxing the weal thy to give money back to low-income Americans.
Despite everything else, blacks vote to stay on the liberal plantation. Pop psychologists would call the relationship between wealthy liberals and blacks co-dependence.
Republicans are wrong if they think they'll win blacks on social issues alone. They need to help blacks understand that lim ited government provides the economic mobility and opportunity they need and that the welfare, redistribution state does the opposite. They must help blacks gain self-confidence so that they can enjoy the benefits that can only come from freedom.
So far, Republicans have failed to do this. Which is another reason why they now sit on the outside looking in.
oh I dunno, I think that had he lived, the dems wouldn’t have gotten so far left - he would have been a moderating force.
The reason that blacks vote Democrat is simple: The liberals have convinced them, through careful manipulation over the course of DECADES, that Republicans hate black people. It really is that simple.
I've posted this story before and I'll do so again. About ten years ago, I had a conversation with a young, female, black coworker. I took her through the Republican platform step by step, and she agreed with every single position. Then, I told her that she'd just agreed with every single position that the Republican party held, and asked her if that was enough to convince her to vote R instead of D. Her answer shocked me: “No... I won't vote for Republicans because they hate black people.”
Hasn't anyone ever wondered why they invariably call conservative blacks “Uncle Tom,” but never say any such thing for a successful liberal black? In the African American community, “Uncle Tom” doesn't just mean a black who acts “white,” as there are lots of blacks who do that, such as Barak Obama, Colin Powell, Oprah Winfrey, etc. It's okay to act “white” as long as you're not conservative. “Uncle Tom” goes further — it carries the same weight of meaning as “collaborator.”
We will continue to get less than ten percent of the African-American vote as long as we continue letting the Dems tell blacks that conservatives hate them.
Please see my post #42.
(I could whine about my own ethnic group, but that isn't relevent here, except the shared grievance politics.)
There is some merit in what you say, but it still doesn't explain the unpleasant fact that every single Black politician (as I said earlier, no matter how Southern, rural, or "sanctified") automatically becomes an across-the-board social liberal (advocating everything from euthanasia, to "animals are people too," to homosexuality, to "creationism is anti-science!") from the very instant they become politicians.
If your Black female was representative of the Black population, why aren't there ever any conservative Black Democrats (at least on non-racial, non-economic issues)?
Honestly. This is what I don't get.
In the sixties there were others like Kennedy (you know, the old Democrat Party - Moynihan, et al) they may have slowed the leftward lurch, but they certainly didn’t stop it.
you are correct, but JFK, being larger than life, would have had considerably greater influence.
Because, like all politicians, they lust for power above all else. If they want the power of moving up in the Democrat machine, that's what they have to believe. ALL politicians change their personal beliefs as they move up the ladder. Remember, Al Gore was pro-life at first...
If your Black female was representative of the Black population, why aren't there ever any conservative Black Democrats (at least on non-racial, non-economic issues)?
That's fairly simple. For decades now, the Democrats have taught blacks that conservative = Republican = racist. Black conservatives get ostracized and demonized, and so they either get quiet or switch over to the Republican party -- VERY hard to do when you've been taught your whole life that Republicans hate you.
Have you ever heard liberals use the phrase "voting in your self-interests?" That's code for "Republicans hate you, so you'd better vote for the Democrat instead."
An interesting theory, and perhaps correct. It just seems to me that at some level in some sleepy little Southern town there would be at least one Black conservative Democrat--and that eventually the radical left social positions would alienate some Blacks somewhere.
Good post. I would only add that IMO, Blacks were on the verge of revolution; a revolution they earned after centuries of abuse. I mean the real kind beyond big city rioting but making politicians fear for their very lives.
Their leaders sought and received $ for their flock from uncle sugar in exchange for peace. As you point out, dependence came with the peace.
Its too bad that Blacks were denied their revolution. Our country would today be better off. My two cents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.