Sorry, but to me, this article sounds like Dem class warfare rhetoric. Nobody in his right mind would have paid Kraus that much money for three months’ work in a typical situation. However, this is an unusual situation. It’s not Kraus’ fault that the company was sold three months after he signed his contract. The company should perform to the contract.
>>It’s not Kraus’ fault that the company was sold three months after he signed his contract.<<
Maybe, but it is congress’s fault for letting Paulson give away billions for stuff like this.