[Bronwynn]

That would make more sense, jellybean, thanks.

I wouldn’t have known that by reading the Time article.

One more thing, if Time appears to already have seen the Obama, Sr v. Dunham divorce papers, and they sure hinted they did when they wrote “according to divorce papers”, I would hope Time wouldn’t have been so careless as to not pick up on anything suspicious.

The Soetoro v. Dunham divorce papers are on internet and the only thing they say is that there were 2 children, 1 a minor and 1 over 18 still in school. That’s it.

http://decalogosintl.org/documents/Soetoro_Divorce.pdf

[jellybean]

I wouldn’t have known that by reading the Time article.

If you read further down in the Times article, it says this:

Ann filed for divorce in Honolulu in January 1964, citing "grievous mental suffering"—the reason given in most divorces at the time. Obama Sr. signed for the papers in Cambridge, Mass., and did not contest the divorce.

I would hope Time wouldn’t have been so careless as to not pick up on anything suspicious.

Well, to give them the benefit of the doubt, their article was written in April before the birth certificate became a big issue. They may have been only looking for marriage/divorce dates. If the papers list a child born in Kenya it may not have set off any alarm bells at the time.