Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. Taxpayers Due Refunds May Get IOUs
MSNBC ^ | 12/31/08 | Patrick Healy

Posted on 12/31/2008 7:41:30 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Calif. Taxpayers Due Refunds May Get IOUs

By Patrick Healy

NBCBayArea.com

updated 8:46 p.m. ET Dec. 31, 2008

If you expect you'll be getting a refund from California when you file your 2008 state income tax return, be prepared: you may instead receive a "registered warrant." Translation: an IOU.

California is rapidly running out of money. Blame it on the state budget deficit that continues to bleed billions of dollars from California's reserves. Facing inadequate credit to make up the difference, California's Controller John Chiang warns that by the end of February, the nation's most populous state may not be able to pay some of its debts, and instead be reduced to issuing those creditors IOUs.

"My office has projected that, in approximately 60 days, there will be insufficient cash available to meet all expenditures reflected in the 2008-09 Budget Act," stated a Tuesday letter from Controller Chiang to the directors of all state agencies. "To ensure that the State can meet its obligations to schools, debt service, and others entitled to payment under the State Constitution, federal law, or court order. California may begin, as early as February 1, 2009, issuing registered warrants...commonly referred to as IOUs...to individuals and entities in lieu of regular payments."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: budgetcrisis; california; iou; mexifornia; taxes; taxreturn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: P-Marlowe

Time to drop your withholding to 0 dependents.


81 posted on 01/01/2009 10:53:20 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wow. What a mess. Stop the spending, cut programs, deport illegals. The governor took a “holiday” vacation in the midst of this financial crisis?! I wonder if he’s offered to cut his own salary?


82 posted on 01/01/2009 11:01:31 AM PST by Girlene (Happy 2009!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...


Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
83 posted on 01/01/2009 11:18:20 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Living in a state that has to balance it’s budget every year, by law, and that has no income tax, I just can’t relate. Oh wait, yes I can, this is how the feds do it too.


84 posted on 01/01/2009 11:43:24 AM PST by SoDak (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wait 6 months and the fed will be sending IOU’s for SS


85 posted on 01/01/2009 11:54:13 AM PST by underbyte (TEOTEWAKI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well, the people of California get what they deserve for voting for liberals.


86 posted on 01/01/2009 11:58:34 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

After my first year in CA (1977) the bank put a 15 day hold on my state tax return


87 posted on 01/01/2009 11:59:07 AM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Just more government theft.


88 posted on 01/01/2009 12:18:42 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

LOL!! Yep I’d be asking that too. Never been there and have no desire to go at all!


89 posted on 01/01/2009 2:00:52 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Note to Calendar... Jan 15th quarterly...check math


90 posted on 01/01/2009 3:20:10 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba
"I’m sorry but as long as the state is issuing welfare checks then the refunds need to come before those do!"

I think that is the number one point to be made here. To send money to welfare recipients before sending over-payments back to taxpayers is absolutely morally corrupt.

91 posted on 01/01/2009 3:50:05 PM PST by Try_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

I think the anger toward Arnold is misplaced. He has actually tried to rein in spending. A half-assed attempt to be sure, but he has tried. He is the only elected California official right now even pushing to address this self-made financial crisis in CA.

Like a quarterback who gets too much credit for wins and too much blame for losses, the masses blame the governor for the states problems. The fact is, the liberal state legisltature has spent CA into near bankruptcy through no less than 4 different gubernatorial administations over the past 25 years. That is a fact. Arnold is not the problem. Impotent as he is, he is at least trying in good faith to address the financial crisis.

The real blame lies with an idiotic electorate that continues to vote in the same overspending legislators year after year after year. The voters are idiots. They are getting the government they deserve (well, not me as I lose every election, bond, proposition...)

The voters are 50% to blame with the Legislature another 25% to blame and the Unions 23% to blame. I think Arnold is about 2% to blame for this problem. Davis couldn’t solve it. Nor could Wilson or Deukmegian.

The voters and unions have destroyed this state.


92 posted on 01/01/2009 4:04:25 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

By the way, as a state employee, I am required to contribute to the union, even if I OPT OUT of the union. Every year the union steals my money and gives it to ONLY Democrat candidates — never to Republicans.How do you like that?

One of the 4 propositions Arnold tried to pass would have prevented the union from doing that. It failed because he bit off more than he could chew and the Teachers Union and Nurses Union lead all other unions into defeating all 4 of those propositions, with help from Conservatives who voted against them because they weren’t “perfect”.

I detest my money being stolen by the unions and used to elect Democrats every year. At least Arnold tried to stop that.


93 posted on 01/01/2009 4:07:41 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SubstanceP

You can’t organize a tax revolt in California. Not while more voters pay no taxes than pay them.


94 posted on 01/01/2009 4:09:01 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Bingo. You nailed the real problem. The voters are mainly responsible for ALL of the problems we have in California and they are getting exactly what they deserve. Sadly, I too am getting what they deserve.


95 posted on 01/01/2009 4:10:26 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I feel bad for saying so, and feel even worse that people like you bear the brunt of their bad voting.


96 posted on 01/01/2009 5:15:09 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; buwaya

As a CA taxpayer, I thought I’d just enclose an ‘IOU’ with my CA 540 (income tax form).


97 posted on 01/01/2009 5:30:53 PM PST by 4Liberty (Discount window +fractional reserve banking = moral hazard + bank corporate welfare + Inflation tax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie; proudCArepublican

Umm isn’t this illegal?
4L
San Fernando Valley resident


98 posted on 01/01/2009 5:36:33 PM PST by 4Liberty (Discount window +fractional reserve banking = moral hazard + bank corporate welfare + Inflation tax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Yes, my union forces me to supply funds for “bargaining” costs.

I am not a member, - to avoid the political dues. Those go straight to Democrat candidates, causes, ballot measures.

It’s really disgusting that the Dems in Sac. can even VOTE on fiscal measures: any increase in spending (unions get this money) means an INCREASE in salaries, therefore union % dues, therefore money to the Dem party’s candidates, causes. So obviously — there is a gross conflict of interest, here.

None of these clowns should be ALLOWED to vote on the budget, due to this gross and obvious conflict of interest.

They will NEVER vote on what helps consumers (parents & kids in public schools, for ex.) and taxpayers: honorable competition, or outsourcing.

They ONLY side with those who feed their insatiable maw — more union/Marxist, collectivist movement money.

4L


100 posted on 01/01/2009 5:43:02 PM PST by 4Liberty (Discount window +fractional reserve banking = moral hazard + bank corporate welfare + Inflation tax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson