Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hulka

In BA’s defense, they still had a couple of spare engines.


11 posted on 01/02/2009 8:38:19 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35
Yes. . .and they didn't know what caused the engine failure, which was observed from the tower—fire blow-out and all that, as well as debris on the runway, and they made the decision to continue?

And given that the cause of the failure was unknown, that they didn't know for certain that the other engine on the same side may have experienced damage due to the failure, let alone the jet body itself or flight control surfaces may have suffered some sort of damage, and there is always the possibility that the unknown situation that caused the first failure would eventually manifest itself in the other engines, and let's not forget the fact that the jet didn't have enough fuel to get to LHR and had to land in Ireland, and (worst of all), given the fact the decision to continue was based upon the potential cost to lodge the passengers while another jet was found, in my opinion, I'd say BA made some very poor decisions. They were very lucky that all that happened was a short landing,

But that's just me.

14 posted on 01/03/2009 8:53:18 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson