I still think the Supremes are planning to kill this. If I read correctly Berg’s is the last case. Personally, I don’t trust or like Berg because of the 9-11 thing. If they had any intention of reviewing this in a meaningful way, they would have done so already.
Berg’s was the first case, not the last. There are plenty more in the pipeline.
>>> Dr Orly Taitz has paperwork in the SCOTUS pipeline too. <<<
No. 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008 Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 29 2008 Application (08A524) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Orly Taitz 26302 La Paz (949) 683-5411
Counsel of Record Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Party name: Gail Lightfoot, et al.
Here’s another interesting case working it’s way (possibly) to the SCOTUS. Chris Strunk has requested, by way of the FOIA, records on Obama from the US Dept. of State, and the US Dept. of Homeland Security. The case is at the US District Court for the District of Columbia. Both departments have IGNORED the FOIA requests by Strunk.