1 posted on
01/07/2009 5:56:07 AM PST by
Dallas59
To: Dallas59
This was a single case that was won. Dear Leaders group could get cases thrown out on the basis of “racism”.
2 posted on
01/07/2009 6:01:55 AM PST by
Dallas59
(Not My President)
To: Dallas59
The fraud is NOT the president, nor does he have an administration -- only the transition team.
3 posted on
01/07/2009 6:04:32 AM PST by
Just A Nobody
(I *LOVE* my Attitude Problem - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
To: Dallas59
I love how this guy is praising the Bush efforts at cutting off funding....except for the fact that it was the NYT that revealed many counter-teorrorist programs including the very successful monitoring of US-Foreign accounts that many Democrats proclaimed shock in but then backed off when it was clear that they were fully aware. I have no doubt that this writer was among those that complained about the program when the NYT violated US law to leak it.
As to Guantanamo - nobody wants them...period. So it looks like they will be shipped off to somewhere else. As to tough conditions - well any valuable info to be obtained from them is long gone so we obviously are not holding them for the fun of it.
Secret prisons will simply become...known prisons.
In the end this article is just making a push for a "civil" war that supports trying terrorists in US courts. It is the beginning of the left now praising certain aspects of Bush anti-terrorism policies and pretending that they never screamed bloody murder since 9/11.
4 posted on
01/07/2009 6:27:21 AM PST by
torchthemummy
(My apologies if this post retreads on ground already covered!)
To: Dallas59
obama has a war on terror?
5 posted on
01/07/2009 6:27:42 AM PST by
GeronL
(long lost freeper)
To: Dallas59
As if O intends to have a war on terror or terrorists.
Like General Powell, he considers those pukes his ‘brothers’.
7 posted on
01/07/2009 7:09:05 AM PST by
Carley
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson