To: gargoyle
Are you Rip Van Winkle? Are you new to the Democrat process of recount, recount, recount, stop recounting when the Dem wins?
How about “finding” ballots after the election? How about counties producing more votes than there are voters? Get a clue.
9 posted on
01/10/2009 7:17:31 AM PST by
Vision
("Test everything. Hold on to the Good." 1 Thessalonians 5:21)
To: Vision
Nice observations. Thanks for jumping in to point out a few facts.
13 posted on
01/10/2009 7:32:31 AM PST by
StAntKnee
(I'm keeping track of failed bids, and Sarah Palin is considered exempt.)
To: Vision
...I guess so. I thought we had a Constitutional Republic, Rule of Law. When I awoke we have a fookin’ democracy! I missed that meeting...
...Look, pal, I got a clue. This chits’ been going on a llllong time. I’ve been awake for a while. I can handle sarcasm, no problem. But, do me a favor and don’t patronize me! OK? HAHAHOOHOOKAY...
14 posted on
01/10/2009 7:34:41 AM PST by
gargoyle
(..."If this be treason, make the most of it.". Patrick Henry...)
To: Vision
As the article states, there is only one Dem on the election board and that Coleman agreed with the make up of it in advamce. The best way to win an election is to get enough votes to avoid a controversy or recount. I have no sympathy for that wimp Coleman anyway.
20 posted on
01/10/2009 7:57:40 AM PST by
mono
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson