Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Is Reported Set to Revise Counterterrorism Efforts
New York Times ^ | Jan. 7, 2009 | Peter Baker

Posted on 01/10/2009 10:53:13 AM PST by FocusNexus

The plan being discussed would eliminate the independent homeland security adviser’s office and assign those duties to the National Security Council to streamline sometimes overlapping functions. A deputy national security adviser would be charged with overseeing the effort to guard against terrorism and to respond to natural disasters.

Mr. Bush's aides, including the national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, have privately urged Mr. Obama's advisers not to get rid of the separate homeland security office, warning that it would load too many responsibilities on the National Security Council and risk important matters' falling through the cracks.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho2008; bhocia; bhodhs; bhogwot; bhonsa; cia; hadley; homelandsecurity; nsa; obama; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Much attention has been given, rightly so, to Obama's selection of Panetta as CIA director, but not enough on Obama's plan to reorganize counterterrorism organizations, until they become ineffective.

Anyone wishing for Obama's success is either totally delusional, or is wishing for the destruction of the US as we know it.

1 posted on 01/10/2009 10:53:16 AM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Obama OWNS this. If we are attacked he gets the boot. I'm pissed as hell that he picked a bunch of know nothing liberals with the same pre 9/11 tendencies to protect us. F-him if we are attacked.
2 posted on 01/10/2009 10:57:16 AM PST by Chgogal (Don't look at me. You elected them, Comrade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

‘wishing for Obama’s success’

Define success.

If he fails and people die, then no one should be happy for that.


3 posted on 01/10/2009 10:58:38 AM PST by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Oh well, like our fellow RINOs say we should all pray for the Terrorist-Elect to succeed.


4 posted on 01/10/2009 10:58:54 AM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Christians will be the new target for investigations.


5 posted on 01/10/2009 10:58:54 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
"...A deputy national security adviser would be charged with overseeing the effort to guard against terrorism and to respond to natural disasters..."

Great. This is not too hard to see that amateur hour is returning to the White House.

Obama is a "Seagull Manager".

6 posted on 01/10/2009 11:00:12 AM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Nope. He’s gonna keep all this power and try to amass more.


7 posted on 01/10/2009 11:00:43 AM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

This is not looking good. I’m glad I don’t live in a major city or highly populated area.


8 posted on 01/10/2009 11:03:49 AM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
“Obama is a “Seagull Manager”.”

Crap, Obama can't even manage a “Chicken Little” like Blago much less an “Attack Bomber” like Bin Laden.

9 posted on 01/10/2009 11:04:47 AM PST by Chgogal (Don't look at me. You elected them, Comrade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“Define success.

If he fails and people die, then no one should be happy for that.”

If Obama SUCCEEDS in implementing his pro-terrorist policies, THAT’s what is going to result in us being attacked. Are you still wishing for him to succeed?


10 posted on 01/10/2009 11:07:03 AM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

This is one of the main reasons a relative of mine is leaving the DC area and moving to Tennessee.


11 posted on 01/10/2009 11:07:31 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Anyone wishing for Obama's success is either totally delusional, or is wishing for the destruction of the US as we know it.

I think you misunderstand the concept of "wishing for his success", that is, wishing that he not be stupid and actually have good ideas and implement them. I certainly hope that he not be stupid and governs wisely and effectively as I would hope anyone would.

12 posted on 01/10/2009 11:07:44 AM PST by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
He hope he succeeds in the term of not failing as a President in terms of our people getting killed.

So yes, I want him to ‘succeed’.

In terms of pushing socialist policies. No.

But in terms of cutting and streamlining the Gov't. Sure, go for it. You can cut out the DHS and it would save lives. Allow people to carry CCW and other things. The Fed Bureaucracy is a joke. I don't care if it's a Rat thats cutting back on it.

13 posted on 01/10/2009 11:11:46 AM PST by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
Obama OWNS this. If we are attacked he gets the boot.

Male bovine feces.

If we are attacked the MSM (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the DNC) will immediately lay the blame at the feet of the long-gone Bush Administration. The American Sheeple will buy the spin hook/line/sinker and Obama gets reelected with an even bigger majority than he got this time around.
14 posted on 01/10/2009 11:11:56 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The definition of *success* here seems open to interpretation. I think it was Bill O’Reilly who had a poll up that asked, “Are you rooting for Obama?”

I did not participate in the poll because it was not clear what that “rooting” was for.

I can only pray that Mr. Obama will he endowed by our Lord with the wisdom NOT to wreak undue havoc upon this nation.


15 posted on 01/10/2009 11:11:58 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: garbanzo

“wishing that he not be stupid and actually have good ideas and implement them. I certainly hope that he not be stupid and governs wisely and effectively as I would hope anyone would.”

Do you see ANY indication of that happening?

As I said “Anyone wishing for Obama’s success is either totally delusional, or...”

I also wish that a nice big island will be created and I could move there. Do you think that will happen? That is more likely, than Obama “governing wisely”.


16 posted on 01/10/2009 11:11:58 AM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“If he fails and people die, then no one should be happy for that.”

You mean, if he SUCCEEDS and people die, don’t you? His goals are not yours. He does not see terrorism as a problem here in the US. It is, perhaps, a nuisance. His goals are: (1) To greatly reduce our intelligence capabilities so that bad Americans cannot gather intelligence against good-hearted people all over the world; and (2) To unionize what remains of HS. That is the success he is gunning for.

The consequences of his success will be regarded as a political problem offset by the millions of dollars in additional union dues flowing into rat coffers—and in any event he’s expecting to be able to blame pretty much everything on Bush for his first four years.


17 posted on 01/10/2009 11:12:07 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

We’re going to get hit again and there’s no doubt who will allow it to happen.


18 posted on 01/10/2009 11:13:01 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Define success.

That is the key, isn't it. 'Success' involves achieving a goal. Other than grandiose platitudes, I have know idea what his goals really are. He has criticized the efforts that have kept us safe for nearly eight years. I can hardly believe someone of such wrong mindedness would ever have a better idea of how to do the job.

No, I don't wish him success. I wish him miserable failure in all his attempts. However I wish our country well. The real answer to our current problems lies with the people and not with those pompous asses who think they rule us.

19 posted on 01/10/2009 11:14:02 AM PST by tbpiper (Al Gore is to Global Warming what Berney Madoff is to Finance .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Getting rid of all federal funding for Planned “Parenthood” and the ACLU would be a great start to the streamlining.....but I highly doubt that will happen. ;-(


20 posted on 01/10/2009 11:14:29 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson