Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
Because of this tax distortion, people have an incentive to buy bigger houses with more bells and whistles than they would otherwise buy.

Partially true, I would argue. Large, flashy houses have throughout history been built to impress others or as a sign of prosperity. Successful businessmen (Vanderbilt, Morgan, Rockefeller) did this before there was an interest deduction or even an income tax. No doubt many people tried to imitate that behavior - to "keep up with the Joneses." Cars are the same way. People want to show off.

I call it the SWIG factor. See What I Got.

49 posted on 01/10/2009 3:23:20 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: abb
No doubt. Some people would undoubtedly continue to buy extravagant houses even without the MID. My only point is that the MID increases the frequency with which this happens, other things being equal.
51 posted on 01/10/2009 3:35:36 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson