Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panetta tied to Marxist think tank? (Institute For Policy Studies) plus ChiCom COSCO deal
several sources | several authors

Posted on 01/11/2009 4:26:45 PM PST by ETL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2009 4:26:47 PM PST by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ETL

CIA Director! So easy, a caveman can do it! I guess the “messiah” had to put Leon somewhere to reward him for all of his help with the campaign. I guess the CIA job is as good as any. This “new direction” America is a real hoot!


2 posted on 01/11/2009 4:31:27 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (CIA Director!....So easy, a caveman can do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Panetta’s infatuation with communism is well known. That Odumbo named him as CIA Director is not surprising, given both of them embrace ideologies that are hostile to the U.S.


3 posted on 01/11/2009 4:31:52 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

They can hang with their buddies at the kgb and in cuba and venezuela. Guess kruschev was right. They buried us. Oh well comrades the bolshevics are inside the gates. May be time for for escape plans before the purges start.


4 posted on 01/11/2009 4:37:46 PM PST by screaminsunshine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
Panetta’s infatuation with communism is well known.

He will spend all his timing tearing it down as much as possible, while figuring out how to line his pockets -- pretty easy to do when you have a budget that no one can see how is spent.

5 posted on 01/11/2009 4:38:19 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Panetta pushed the Monterey Bay Sanctuary upon us....no more commercial fishing around these parts of the Central Coast....thanks Leon, now I get all my fish via air freight from SE asia.


6 posted on 01/11/2009 4:38:27 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

And Hitlery at State will expedite it.


7 posted on 01/11/2009 4:40:27 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ought-six; All
Hitler Quote
8 posted on 01/11/2009 4:41:51 PM PST by Larousse2 (Like June Carter Cash, "I'm just tryin' to matter.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Didn't Bush 42 work in the CIA before he was prez? He should be getting in touch with Bush 43 and putting in some last minute suggestions as to how 43 can plant a few double agents to watch Panetta.
9 posted on 01/11/2009 4:47:55 PM PST by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Leon Panetta was Clinton's Chief of Staff during Chinagate...

"Panetta left Congress in 1993 at the beginning of his ninth term to become director of the Office of Management and Budget for the incoming Clinton administration. Panetta was appointed chief of staff to President Clinton in July 1994 and served in that position until January 1997. In that role, he was widely praised for bringing order and focus to White House operations and policymaking. Since 2005, he has served as a member of the Independent Task Force on Immigration and America's Future. In 2006, Panetta was chosen to serve on the Iraq Study Group.
http://www.ppic.org/main/bio.asp?i=383

From a 2003 Washington Post article:

"...a statement [Bill] Clinton made in February 2002, in which he told an audience in Australia, 'This is a unique moment in U.S. history, a brief moment in history, when the U.S. has preeminent military, economic and political power. It won't last forever. This is just a period, a few decades this will last.'

Clinton continued...

'In all probability, we won't be the premier political and economic power we are now' in a few decades, he said, pointing to the growth of China's economy and the growing economic strength of the European Union.

Whether the United States maintains its military supremacy, he said, depends in part on how much those other entities invest in their militaries, and Clinton said working cooperatively is essential to U.S. interests.

But he said he did not want to be misunderstood. 'I never advocated that we not have the strongest military in the world...I don't think a single soul has thought I was advocating scaling back our military.'

Source: Washington Post article from May 2003:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A62253-2003Apr30&notFound=true

or find his remarks here (Talon News):
Clinton Predicts America's Decline:
http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/nw03/talonnews/0503/newswire-tn-050503d.htm

"'We like your president. We want to see him reelected', former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way."

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate
By Richard Poe
May 26, 2003

CHINA WILL LIKELY replace the USA as world leader, said Bill Clinton in a recent Washington Post interview. It is just a matter of time. Clinton should know. He has personally done more to build China’s military strength than any man on earth.

Most Americans have heard of the so-called "Chinagate " scandal. Few understand its deadly import, however. Web sites such as "Chinagate for Dummies" and its companion "More Chinagate for Dummies" offer some assistance. Unfortunately, with a combined total of nearly 8,000 words, these two sites – like so many others of the genre – offer more detail than most of us "dummies" can absorb.

For that reason, in the 600 words left in this column, I will try to craft my own "Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate," dedicated to all those busy folks like you and me whose attention span tends to peter out after about 750 words. Here goes.

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented little threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldn’t hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. Few could reach North America and those that made it would likely miss their targets.

Thanks to Bill Clinton, China can now hit any city in the USA, using state-of-the-art, solid-fueled missiles with dead-accurate, computerized guidance systems and multiple warheads.

China probably has suitcase nukes as well. These enable China to strike by proxy – equipping nuclear-armed terrorists to do their dirty work, while the Chinese play innocent. Some intelligence sources claim that China maintains secret stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons on U.S. soil, for just such contingencies.

In 1997, Clinton allowed China to take over the Panama Canal. The Chinese company Hutchison Whampoa leased the ports of Cristobal and Balboa, on the east and west openings of the canal respectively, thus controlling access both ways. A public outcry stopped Clinton in 1998 from leasing California’s Long Beach Naval Yard to the Chinese firm COSCO. Even so, China can now strike U.S. targets easily from their bases in Panama, Vancouver and the Bahamas.

How did China catch up so fast? Easy. We sold them all the technology they needed – or handed it over for free. Neither neglect nor carelessness are to blame. Bill Clinton did it on purpose.

As a globalist, Clinton promotes "multipolarity" – the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others.

To this end, Clinton appointed anti-nuclear activist Hazel O’Leary to head the Department of Energy. O’Leary set to work "leveling the playing field," as she put it, by giving away our nuclear secrets. She declassified 11 million pages of data on U.S. nuclear weapons and loosened up security at weapons labs.

Federal investigators [Cox Report] later concluded that China made off with the "crown jewels" of our nuclear weapons research under Clinton’s open-door policy – probably including design specifications for suitcase nukes. Meanwhile, Clinton and his corporate cronies raked in millions.

In his book The China Threat, Washington Times correspondent Bill Gertz describes how the system worked. Defense contractors eager to sell technology to China poured millions of dollars into Clinton’s campaign. In return, Clinton called off the dogs.

Janet Reno and other counterintelligence officials stood down while Lockheed Martin, Hughes Electronics, Loral Space & Communications and other U.S. companies helped China modernize its nuclear strike force.

"We like your president. We want to see him reelected," former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way.

Clinton’s top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China.

Clinton recieved funding directly from known or suspected Chinese intelligence agents, among them James and Mochtar Riady who own the Indonesian Lippo Group; John Huang; Charlie Trie; Ted Sioeng; Maria Hsia; Wang Jun and others.

Commerce Secretary Ron Brown served as Clinton’s front man in many Chinagate deals. When investigators began probing Brown’s Lippo Group and Chinagate connections, Brown died suddenly in a suspicious April 1996 plane crash.

Needless to say, China does not share Clinton’s enthusiasm for globalism or multipolarity. The Chinese look out for Number One.

"War [with the United States] is inevitable; we cannot avoid it," said Chinese Defense Minister General Chi Haotian in 2000. "The issue is that the Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war." Bill Clinton has given them a good start.

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate:
http://www.richardpoe.com/column.cgi?story=125

or,
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/26/214938.shtml
(this version hasn't the necessary hyperlinks, but the above doesn't seem to be available any longer)
_________________________________

Related Stories
Richard Poe, "Chinagate: The Third-Way Scandal" (June 3, 1999)
Christopher Ruddy, "Russia and China Prepare for War: Parts I - VIII," NewsMax.com (March 9 -18, 1999)

10 posted on 01/11/2009 4:51:31 PM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
____________________________________________________________

Russia, China flex muscles in joint war games
Reuters: Aug 17, 2007

CHEBARKUL, Russia (Reuters) - Russia and China staged their biggest joint exercises on Friday but denied this show of military prowess could lead to the formation of a counterweight to NATO.

"Today's exercises are another step towards strengthening the relations between our countries, a step towards strengthening international peace and security, and first and foremost, the security of our peoples," Putin said.

Fighter jets swooped overhead, commandos jumped from helicopters on to rooftops and the boom of artillery shells shook the firing range in Russia's Ural mountains as two of the largest armies in the world were put through their paces.

The exercises take place against a backdrop of mounting rivalry between the West, and Russia and China for influence over Central Asia, a strategic region that has huge oil, gas and mineral resources.

Russia's growing assertiveness is also causing jitters in the West. Putin announced at the firing range that Russia was resuming Soviet-era sorties by its strategic bomber aircraft near NATO airspace.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-29030120070817?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
____________________________________________________________

From National Public Radio (NPR), August 29, 2006:
"Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has been visiting countries such as China, Iran and Russia as part of an effort to build a 'strategic alliance' of interests not beholden to the United States. He considers the United States his arch enemy.":
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5729764

11 posted on 01/11/2009 4:54:26 PM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

He lives and breathes a socialist ideology. Why should anyone be surprised that he has such affiliations as this?

A lot like noting that water is wet...


12 posted on 01/11/2009 5:00:56 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
Oh well comrades the bolshevics are inside the gates. May be time for for escape plans before the purges start.

Or time to lock and load.
13 posted on 01/11/2009 5:03:57 PM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Dude, you can keep posting this to your bandwidth’s desire but the American braindead have their fingers in their ears singing la-la-la-la.


14 posted on 01/11/2009 5:14:45 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM
He lives and breathes a socialist ideology. Why should anyone be surprised that he has such affiliations as this? A lot like noting that water is wet...

The point is to (hopefully) outrage people enough that they DO something about it, like writing to our 'leaders' in congress and demanding that they NOT allow this traitorous bum to become CIA chief! That they confront him on these serious matters. Senator Shelby (a good guy) is an excellent place to start:

Senator Shelby: Member:

* Subcommittee on Defense
* Subcommittee on Homeland Security
* Subcommittee on Foreign Operations
* Subcommittee on Labor, HHS, and Education
* Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury, Judiciary, and Housing and Urban Development

http://shelby.senate.gov/legislation/committees.cfm

15 posted on 01/11/2009 5:18:06 PM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

If you choose to bury YOUR head in the sand, then please do so without discouraging others from promoting TRUTH.

Save yourself the effort of typing.


16 posted on 01/11/2009 5:24:12 PM PST by AmericanGirlRising (Buying carbon credits will not get me into Heaven. I am second - http://iamsecond.com/#/home/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ETL

BUMP (for exposing further evidence of leftist treason)


17 posted on 01/11/2009 5:24:52 PM PST by AmericanGirlRising (Buying carbon credits will not get me into Heaven. I am second - http://iamsecond.com/#/home/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGirlRising

Thank you! Apathy and defeatism will never solve the problem.


18 posted on 01/11/2009 5:28:23 PM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGirlRising
Reread my post very carefully and get back to me.

I'll help you out. I'm making the point that most of the American public has their heads in the sand as you put it.
19 posted on 01/11/2009 5:30:13 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

You expect too much from two presidents who were both in favor of a One-World government i.e. in favor of surrendering the sovereignty of this nation while, at the same time, claiming to defend and protect the Constitution. The upcoming Administration won’t be much different.


20 posted on 01/11/2009 5:34:02 PM PST by 353FMG (The sky is not falling, yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson