Read the definition I posted, and read for content this time.
It does not say that the opposite of true is false; it says truth can defined in many ways, often loosely, and is best not used in physics (and I added, in science).
A scientific theory is not proclaimed as truth, Truth, or TRVTH. It is proclaimed as the current best explanation for a given set of facts. That is why, when new facts arise, a theory can be modified or even partially discarded--because it was never proclaimed as truth, Truth, or even TRVTH.
But this does not make it false, and to claim such is to engage in sophomoric word play.
“Mat 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.”
Careful, big C. Teh Man has his eye on you.