Posted on 01/12/2009 10:10:30 AM PST by randita
If the feds keep printing dollars to prevent banks from going insolvent due and plans to borrow at 1 trillion dollar defecits, our currency will devalue and the world will drop it as a reserve currency. Devaluation means all our imports (oil, raw materials, food, etc) will inflate. Weak dollar played a role in increasing our oil price during the last energy crisis. The residential mortgage crisis is not the last threat to our banks, we have a commercial real estate mortgage crisis and credit card default crisis looming as retail sales dropped, and more people become unemployed. Peter Schiff is not crazy.
I agree with Denninger on this and would add that the collapse in mortgage securitizations and the bursting of the credit bubble, tightening of lending standards, etc is highly deflationary. Bernanke will try his quantitative easing/money printing to fight deflation, but Japan tried that starting in 2001 and the money just piled up in the reserve accounts of banks.
I don’t expect severe deflation, but the prevailing economic winds are clearly deflationary. All you need to do is look at the yields on long bonds and see that the bond market is not expecting inflation in the foreseeable future.
This is no surprise. Why do you think the Fed stopped reporting M3 in 2006? The Bank of England just started doing the same thing this year. They don’t want the people to know how much money is actually in circulation.
I don’t agree because this can happen. Obama has already mentioned wanting the minimum wage to rise to $10 an hour so if infct the dems decide to do this then this will happen ala Jimmy Carter when he rasied the minimum wage 3 times in two years between 1977-1979.
Au contraire, M. Denninger.
This is nonsense. There are other ways to trigger inflation other than labor cost. For example, printing TONS of money reduces the value of each dollar therefore requiring more dollars per item.
This is not going to happen for some very good reasons.
The first is that the typical American is not going to revolt as long as he has a roof over his head, and food in his belly. This was the single reason that “Ol’ Frank” Roosevelt succeeded where Herbert Hoover failed.
But importantly, this doesn’t mean that if Obama provides these things, he gets to do anything else he wants to. Far from it. In fact, even though it is the exact opposite of what he wants to do, he will probably have no choice but to dismantle the socialism we already have.
The odds are that after just a few years, he will be helpless, hopeless, and prematurely aged by things beyond his power to control.
His internationalism is dead already, all international trade but oil and food drying up. The credit crunch still has some painful collapses to endure, such as the Alt-A and ARM mortgage collapses, 1.5 times larger than the subprime collapse. And the collapse of the US Treasury bill market is going to be awesome, and remembered in history books for hundreds of years.
In short, there is little the federal government can do other than house and feed homeless and hungry Americans, possible renounce its national debt, eliminate Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; and finally to not tax those trying to rebuild all the industry we outsourced in the past 40 years.
“Au contraire, M. Denninger.”
If we’re facing hyperinflation in the next 10 years, why are people willing to buy treasury bonds yielding 2.33%? They would be crazy to do that if even significant inflation is in our future. The bond market could always be wrong, but it is entitled to considerable deference IMO- bond purchasers tend to be saavy folks.
Employee free choice act forced unionization to demand protection from trade. Here in union Maryland food prices are going up, not down. That is also protectionism. Government intervention keeps natural gas prices high, used instead of cheap heating oil.
Schiff’s theory is that prices can go up independent of US demand , once the world economy figures out that can proceed without giving stuff to the USA, based on devaluation of the dollar. But I get your point SChiff did NOT predict the current (partial) deflation with crash and this is the question of the day.
Liberal Cramer on CNBC says Obama needs to create inflation to start another boom.
“For example, printing TONS of money reduces the value of each dollar therefore requiring more dollars per item.”
It depends on what happens to the money after the federal reserve or other central bank prints it. The Bank of Japan started printing money by the boatload in 2001 to combat their deflation, but it had very little effect because the Japanese commercial banks were unwilling to lend the money and it just piled up in their reserve accounts and didn’t enter the Japanese economy. Several years later, Japan is easing back into deflation again.
You can print all the money you want, but if just piles up in a vault somewhere and doesn’t enter the economy then it has little effect.
What happens when the Chinese/Japanese, etc stop buying US bonds? That is the crux of the question. On the one hand they have incentive to prop up the USD as they already hold so much US debt. On the other hand, the maxim ‘throwing good money after bad’ comes to mind.
If the rest of the world refuses to fund our Trillion $ stimulus package, what then? Supply/demand dynamics can only be delayed for so long, if their is no external demand for the huge bond issuance to come this year from the Gov’t, the yeild must rise to attract buyers. Ben the hellicopter man is more like the Wizard of Oz right now, and soon the curtain will be pulled back and he will be exposed, as will the AAA credit rating the US Gov’t enjoys.
‘Gov’t is the only entity that can take a valuable commodity like paper and render it worthless emrely by applying ink’ Ludwig Von Mises
?
RE “This is where the Peter Schiffs and McHughs are wrong in their hyperinflation thesis and their “defensive” measures to try to do something about it “
Schiff calls for personal savings, capital investment and creating an private industry that can compete, not a bunch of government employee consumers. He is not completely conservative(as recently defined), and has some ideas that conservatives don’t like.
“What happens when the Chinese/Japanese, etc stop buying US bonds? That is the crux of the question.”
I agree completely- then and only then will the house of cards come crashing down. But until that day- which may be decades away or may be much sooner- it will be impossible for the US economy to truly collapse because it’s being subsidized on a massive scale by the countries that actually produce things.
Early indications are that China still wants to keep buying our debt, but with their slowing economy and domestic stimulus spending they won’t have as much money to do so with.
But this did happen in the 1930s, and it led to the rise of the unions in the first place.
A repeat would most likely represent a revival of unions.
“Schiff calls for personal savings, capital investment and creating an private industry that can compete, not a bunch of government employee consumers.”
I like Schiff, but his clients have lost a lot of money in this economic collapse. His whole thesis was that you could protect yourself from the coming economic collapse by buying Asian stocks, but those stocks have been hit even harder than US stocks. Schiff bought into the utterly false notion that the emerging Asian economies had decoupled from the US economy, and he appears intent on riding that lame horse until it dies. I suspect he knows he screwed up, but once you pick a basic investment strategy and write books about it it’s pretty hard to back down and admit you were wrong.
Nobody --that would be horrible!!!!!!
--assuming of course that during four years of 10% inflation, incomes stay exactly as they are today.
Right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.