Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Prince Harry a Bigot?
Pajamas Media ^ | January 12 | Robert McCain

Posted on 01/12/2009 12:09:25 PM PST by AJKauf

Prince Harry of England has been forced to apologize for calling an army comrade a “Paki.” His reference to “our little Paki friend, Ahmed” — captured in a video recorded three years ago, when Harry was attending Sandhurst military academy — was almost universally denounced.

When I declared on my blog that I was unaware “Paki” had attained slur status in England — “How does the omission of two syllables change this from a description of someone’s nationality to a racist epithet?” — a commenter retorted: “There’s no way an American would use the word ‘Jap’ to describe a Japanese, or ‘Chink’ for Chinese.” Good point. One observes that, as with the condensation of “Pakistani” into “Paki,” both “Jap” and “Chink” have the effect of abbreviation, and perhaps there is a derogatory intent implied in depriving these groups of an extra syllable or two....

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: harry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2009 12:09:28 PM PST by AJKauf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Paki ping


2 posted on 01/12/2009 12:12:45 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

“There’s no way an American would use the word ‘Jap’ to describe a Japanese”

Not true, when I was 6 years old, I called them Japs because we were at war with them, and they were not an admirable country.

Things can change.


3 posted on 01/12/2009 12:13:51 PM PST by rjones42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Hmmm I hate the PC police as much as anyone, but I think I’ll let a guy who is filthy rich for no reason other than he was a Prince— I mean are you joking? What is this the 14th century? I think I’ll let a guy who has an even poorer work to wealth to fame ratio than Paris Hilton fight his own battles. Thanks.


4 posted on 01/12/2009 12:15:32 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjones42
“There’s no way an American would use the word ‘Jap’ to describe a Japanese”

Wanna bet?

5 posted on 01/12/2009 12:16:12 PM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjones42

Don’t forget some people used “kraut” for the Germans during WWII as well.


6 posted on 01/12/2009 12:16:44 PM PST by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: exist

We’ll always have Paris................


7 posted on 01/12/2009 12:17:20 PM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
"Paki" a slur?

Who knew?
8 posted on 01/12/2009 12:18:19 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

What is and is not an epithet is arbitrary. Sometimes they’re (more or less) clever jokes, like Wetback. Sometimes they’re shorter versions of perfectly acceptable names. Nigger is no more than a shortened Negro. Paki, Spic, Chink, Jap, etc. are racist, but Brit is A-okay, for some reason. There’s no sense trying to understand the process.

Both sides, the slurrers and the offended, try to determine what is and what isn’t acceptable. The slurrers grab ever new and more demeaning words once the old ones get worn out. The offended have two very strange tactics. First, they dub words that used to be perfectly fine, like Negro and midget, and suddenly declare them racist. Second, they steal words that used to be insults and start using them to refer to eachother, like Gay and Nigger. We do that here on FR, too. Capitalist began as an insult, now it’s a badge of honor.


9 posted on 01/12/2009 12:19:43 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LottieDah

“Don’t forget some people used ‘kraut’ for the Germans during WWII as well.”

Which is exactly why I think Jap is perfectly okay to use. You can always insult a nation that you went to war with, in my opinion. The Japs and Krauts, likewise, can call me whatever they want.


10 posted on 01/12/2009 12:21:08 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rjones42
The term Paki is not derogatory in the Af-Pak theater and among Pakistani contacts.

Brits however have a generalized dislike/distrust for the Pakistanis that live in Great Britain. In GB only, the term "Paki" has evolved to take on that dislike/distrust and is no longer the friendly term it used to be.

Now, if my Brit friends, after 250 years, would stop referring to Americans as "Colonials"........ I can live with "Yanks".

11 posted on 01/12/2009 12:21:10 PM PST by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

No, Harry isn’t a bigot; he was speaking among friends about another friend. Anyone who says he hasn’t engaged in this kind of back and forth good-natured banter among friends of different backgrounds is full of crap.


12 posted on 01/12/2009 12:21:23 PM PST by mcswan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

I doubt its a slur.

Jap isn’t really a slur. There ARE slur words for Japanese and Jap isn’t one of them. And “Chink” IS a slur and certainly NOT an abbreviation for Chinese like Jap or Pali is.

Just another case of the Muzzies (is that a slur?) seeing how far they can make the Dhimmis (I think THAT is a slur) crawl to please them.


13 posted on 01/12/2009 12:23:23 PM PST by ZULU ( TRAPPED IN NEW JERSEY!!! Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

We care about the end product of three centuries of inbreeding...because.....help me out here folks...because....why?

Sheesh.


14 posted on 01/12/2009 12:25:27 PM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth
I wonder if that same “Paki” called the prince a “Brit”............

When I heard about this, I thought he sounded like most military I know....they need to get over themselves....

15 posted on 01/12/2009 12:26:13 PM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shiva
That example was given in a derogatory manner for a derogatory purpose. What you have is a Brit who thinks making a reference to Americans is as low as it goes.

Got a surprise for him ~ best thing to ever happen to England since the battle of the Somme was the blitz, Fur Shur.

16 posted on 01/12/2009 12:27:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Didn’t know “Jap” was an abbreviation for “Chinese” ~ boy will the folks down at the sushi joint be surprised at that one!


17 posted on 01/12/2009 12:29:40 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Now everyone is has to be p.c. Enemies are enemies. All being cordial gets you is blown up.


18 posted on 01/12/2009 12:30:30 PM PST by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

This is about the dumbest story I have ever seen.

Why can’t the British press just accept the fact that the prince is a couragous, patriotic young man with a charming personality and move on.


19 posted on 01/12/2009 12:33:01 PM PST by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Dunno. I doubt whether the remarks of a royal frat boy in the service must be weighed the same way as they are in everyday life. Normally I am not a big fan of the ‘victim’ deciding how ‘grieved’ he or she is by a remark - it’s a bit of a license to kill, metaphorically speaking. But I did not hear yet if the ‘offended’ party took the remarks at face value or if there was just some ornery teasing going on. Anyway, I think the issue got way too much coverage, as if are not any more important things going on... like Hamas getting a good old and well deserved pounding.


20 posted on 01/12/2009 12:33:28 PM PST by whereisreagan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson