1. So no one should ever argue against his teachings? Stand up to his errors in teaching? Whether I choose to accept his teachings or not is not the question. Should I not argue for the Faith with an Atheist? Satanist? He has made his sexuality the central point of his existence. If that is non-debatable than what is?
2. God made him a man. No one should try and correct him even though he is going down the wrong path? Should Christ have not told the prostitute to “Go and sin no more”? I hope he repents and joins the church once again. Until that happens, can you honestly say he’s serving His purpose other than being a warning to the orthodox?
3. I fail to see any connection between this subject and the Good Samaratin parable. You apparently are more concerned about treating this man nicely because of his chosen sexuality than you are in providing instruction and correction where error has occurred.
4. I wasn’t condemning his prayer. I have no right too. With that said I would hope his prayer would be more along the lines of: “Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner”. Somehow, I doubt it will be such.
Are you a member of his congregation ? Privy to his teachings ?? If not, how are they conveyed to you ???
The Good Samaritin ( I finally looked up the spelling ) was despised on sight by the decent Israelites - yet proved to be closer to God’s will than they were.
I really don’t care about his sexuality. It poses no threat to me or mine ; and, by its very nature, limits his influence on others .
I take it you wish to correct and instruct him.
Fine. Let him that is without sin cast the first stone.