To: hunter112
This thing got fishy to me the minute I heard that the sons "turned him in". Whether they were directly involved with the fraud, or just knew about it, or just should have known about it is immaterial. The sons ran the broker dealer. If he wasn't trading through them at all, they had to know. If the level of trades wasn't commensurate with his assets, they must have suspected. It's impossible to believe they never solicited their fathers business, or that he directed all of it elsewhere.
81 posted on
01/15/2009 9:23:58 AM PST by
SJackson
(The American people are wise in wanting change, 2 terms is plenty, Condi Rice)
To: SJackson
The sons ran the broker dealer. I didn't know that, interesting. Yes, do a little ball-busting on them while we're at it. Then stick their sorry butts in project housing.
89 posted on
01/15/2009 4:44:02 PM PST by
hunter112
(We seem to be on an excrement river in a Native American watercraft without a propulsion device.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson