Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: absolootezer0

“i don’t see why they’re charged with child porn for having pics of themselves.”

Look up the federal definition of child porn, it does not say anyone is exempt from “production of” the material.

You produce it, or posess it, it’s illegal.

The justice in this case will be in the sentencing, or even in what exact charges are brought up when the trial starts.

There have been cases of underage girls running porn pay sites, pay webcams in particular. With today’s technology it’s something a kid can do in her bedroom without parents knowing.


21 posted on 01/15/2009 7:27:52 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow; absolootezer0
“i don’t see why they’re charged with child porn for having pics of themselves.”

Look up the federal definition of child porn, it does not say anyone is exempt from “production of” the material. You produce it, or posess it, it’s illegal.

THIS IS THE POLICE!

TAKE YOU HANDS OFF THE KEYBOARD AND PUT THEM BEHIND YOUR HEAD. EVERYBODY THAT HAS LOADED THIS POST TO THEIR COMPUTER IS HEREBY CHARGED WITH CHILD PORN!


40 posted on 01/15/2009 7:48:45 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson